2 comments

[ 5.1 ms ] story [ 20.9 ms ] thread
It's an interesting claim. Basically the AI's success is because it covers its shortcomings by claiming to be 1) young (plausibility for not knowing commonly known things), and 2) speaking in a non-native language he's not fluent in (cover for not communicating well).

This leads to the question: where do you draw the line? Could a computer pass the Turing Test if its "parents" claimed it's their baby mashing on the keyboard, and the computer just outputs random characters?