Peter Norvig: Warning signs in Experimental Design and Interpretation (norvig.com) 34 points by ecuzzillo 18y ago ↗ HN
[–] tel 18y ago ↗ Norvig always has exceptional essays. This kind of understanding should be prerequisite to being allowed to read scientific papers.At the very least it's required to demonstrate personal credibility when talking about said papers.
[–] yubrew 18y ago ↗ "Humans are very good at detecting patterns, but rather poor at detecting randomness." This is so true.
2 comments
[ 4.2 ms ] story [ 15.9 ms ] threadAt the very least it's required to demonstrate personal credibility when talking about said papers.