Honestly, I feel like this is one of the "the internet won't be anything worthwhile in 5 years" articles, so I definitely think something like a smartwatch will make it into our lives. That being said, I'm pretty scared of that fact, because in my life I try to win back my focus and try to be more mindful about the things I do, a smartwatch won't help with that. It's just another outlet (or input) that takes away our time from creating and shifts it to consuming.
Thus why I tend to keep everything limited and 'dumb' that's digital, minus my principal/only computer. I work online, I don't need to be online when I'm off. One problem, though, is the offline conversations I start sometimes come from things done/seen online so I'm 'online' even when I don't particularly want to be.
> It's just another outlet (or input) that takes away our time from creating and shifts it to consuming.
Perhaps it's because I haven't configured my notifications well enough in the first place, but I think my smartwatch has saved me a reasonable amount of time in the last few weeks simply by allowing me to dismiss and ignore non-critical notifications without reaching for my phone.
I don't want one. I'm old enough to remember the trendy digital watches of the 1980s and how quickly the novelty of being able to tell the time in Tokyo and New York, or being able to do calculations, or being able to play a beepy tune wore off. Yes on a modern smart watch the multimedia experience will be much better, but I'm still doubtful about the usefulness and ergonomics. You could maybe do wrist based videoconferencing - as predicted in the 20th century - but just the relative angle of your wrist to your face probably won't make it a very flattering experience.
One possible useful function for a smartwatch would be as a wireless storage device. That would mean that you don't need to upload anything to "the cloud" and can be pretty sure of having your data with you at all times. That's not much better than storing data on a phone though.
A while back I did a lot of business travel and in that situation a watch with world time actually has real value. Same story with ergonomics- rushing through a crowded airport with luggage in one hand and documents in another, it is much more convenient to have a device strapped to your wrist rather than having to reach into your pocket. I think a 'hands-free' smart device will prove to be useful in many other unexpected ways, regardless of the screen size.
The marketing for them, in my opinion, shouldn't even mention the word 'watch'.
Mobile phone manufacturers and tech journalists believe a smart watch is an extension of your phone, a second screen that saves you getting your phone out to do basic things. This is the vision that will, probably, sell quite well. On the other hand, the general population believe a smart watch is a watch that does some extra fancy stuff. That dissonance is something that is going to be very difficult to overcome while 'smart watches' just look like big, ugly watches that do things your phone already does.
I think the angle of extension of phone will never really fly for much of the population, I could see something similar to tablet uptake.
I think things will really get interesting when I can ditch the phone all together. Think bendable screen around your wrist which straightens out (or doesn't) when you use it.
Something no one seems to understand, is that the smartphone revolution didn't happen because we suddenly had touchscreens and processors powerful enough to have a relatively decent OS. We'd had that for years beforehand; someone would've gotten it sooner.
It was the fucking user interface.
That's all iOS did. It got the UI right. It didn't take 10 awkward actions to check your mail. You didn't have to go through complex menus to add contacts to your address book. You could browse the internet, have it be the real internet, have it feel like the real internet- and it felt manageable with the ability to zoom in and out, and properly move through web forms.
Smart watches, similar to Google Glass, are starting from zero again. They're brilliant ideas, as brilliant as the smartphone was before them. They're obvious, which is why they're brilliant. What isn't obvious, is how you make the entire experience simple.
So, are smartwatches going to take off? Probably not right now. Neither is Google Glass. There's a lot of talented UI guys involved with both, but you can't get it just half-right. It needs to feel right, and every way it feels wrong needs to feel like it's wrong in its own way, and not because it doesn't do it the way something else does. And right now, no one has either figured out that much.
I think rollout of 3G and affordable mobile data tariffs were very important to smartphones. If you'd had an iphone in 2004 it wouldn't have been much use because it would be too slow and you wouldn't be able to afford to use it.
But there was still a fairly short window between common availability of wifi and Edge and the iphone. Especially when you consider that the iphone was probably in development for several years.
IMO we all have Apple and Cingular to thank for that. Palm and Microsoft were more than happy to allow telcos to force customers to pay extra fees to unlock Wi-Fi and to pay for insane, complicated data plans; so much so that Apple's demands basically had Verizon telling Steve Jobs to go fuck himself. It wasn't until the success of the iPhone that the ridiculous policies and prices of phone service started to drop.
That opinion is terribly short sighted. Cingular/AT&T/Verizon was very late to the mobile data revolution, globally speaking. The market would have developed the same way without the North American carries on board. Which they hardly were. I seem to remember quaint rules against tethering at the time of the iPhone.
Agreed, the broadband situation in the UK leaves a lot to be desired. Building mobile networks is still very much a national regulatory affair, with a lot of upfront capital costs, so even the big multinational service providers do not offer the same service in two different countries (often charging you for roaming when you go abroad, even within the same provider's network!).
I've been waiting for some big provider to offer true multinational mobile service atleast within the EU, where the regulatory framework is similar and necessary agreements in place. But it looks like I will be waiting forever...
The smartphone revolution didn't happen because we suddenly had touchscreens and processors powerful enough to have a relatively decent OS, We'd had that for years beforehand; someone would've gotten it sooner.
Not really. It is hard to imagine now, but back in 2007 the ability to pack a desktop-grade machine into the size of a chocolate bar was such an overwhelming technical leap that it literally panicked industry leaders, who didn't think it was even possible at the time [1,2]:
"Mike Lazaridis was at home on his treadmill and watching television when he first saw the Apple iPhone in early 2007. There were a few things he didn't understand about the product. So, that summer, he pried one open to look inside and was shocked. It was like Apple had stuffed a Mac computer into a cellphone, he thought.
To Mr. Lazaridis, (...) the iPhone was a device that broke all the rules. The operating system alone took up 700 megabytes of memory, and the device used two processors. The entire BlackBerry ran on one processor and used 32 MB. Unlike the BlackBerry, the iPhone had a fully Internet-capable browser. (...) RIM by contrast used a rudimentary browser that limited data usage.
(...) If that thing catches on, we're competing with a Mac, not a Nokia, he recalled telling his staff."
The whole anecdote tells your more about Blackberry than about the state of technology. That he was watching it at home on his TV on his treadmill when it was widely anticipated that Apple would be releasing a phone that was something special speaks to his complacency.
There are definitely people that are going to want a smartwatch. To me, a watch is a pure accessory, and i have yet to see a decent one (except for the Motorola 360).
Function-wise, i don't see the point of getting one at the moment.
If I only have to charge it once a month or less, sure. Once every day or two is a nonstarter. I have enough trouble finding all of the plugs and keeping my phone charged.
One could, of course, argue that it's even less likely you're going to find the plug if you only need it once a month as opposed to once a day.
However, to chime into the overall discussion: I don't really see myself wearing a smart watch. The last time I've worn a watch was in 4th grade. I really never liked the feeling of wearing one even when they were lightweight and since then I also never missed wearing one, so I don't think this is going to change.
If I'm willing to pulling out my phone and looking at it just to get the time, I would assume that I'm equally willing to do that for whatever other task these smart watches can fulfil.
That said: Who knows what we're going to see in the future. Maybe there will be a killer application that would make the prospect of wearing something on my wrist actually bearable, but for now, nothing I can think of would make me want to.
Buy a wireless charger, trust me it is worth every single dollar (not that expensive for a cheap qi charger on ebay anyway).
I have one at my workstation at home and one at work, and never have to find the cable to charge my phone. Which also mean I'll never wear out the charging socket :)
I think inductive charging will solve a lot of that. No need to find plugs if you can just put the phone and watch on the nightstand and have them automatically charged.
I've always hated wearing anything on my arms or wrists, even including log-sleeve shirts. I was thankful for the day I got to ditch my watch in favor of a cell phone, and I have no intention of going back.
(I used to teach a children's sailing class, so I needed to tell the time in order to know when to sail back to the docks.)
I've wanted a watch for about 15 years now. I don't think adding more features my phone already has is going to change the status quo.
Main reason I've never got around to buying a watch: I always have my phone.
In fact this brings up another thought ive been kicking around for a while: wearable computing and whether they will "fly" with audiences, the truth is, they already do - phones, whether you consider clothing or not is pretty much on your persons 24 hours a day. Its basically underwear for a lot of people. Watches, while not "smart", are computers to some extent. I think smart watches, are a natural progression but I dont see them being the next "mobile" like some would have you believe.
I think most people don't even know they want a smart watch yet because they've never seen an actual "smart watch" (everything on the market right now is shit). It will probably evolve to the point where the word "watch" doesn't even make sense anymore, like the word "phone" does today. People need to stop thinking about using a watch for telling time. That's the least of the problems an always-on wrist-device needs to solve.
Personally I'm interested in all the sensors they can possibly cram into it. If they can figure out how to get blood pressure readings from it, I'll wear it 24 7. Judging from this [1] it seems a wrist device can do BP measurements.
> I think most people don't even know they want a smart watch
Maybe I'm the minority here, but I haven't felt the use of even HAVING a watch for like... 15 years of something. Unless you care about fashion, there's no real need to have something 24/7 on your wrist just to indicate the hour or do trivial other tasks. The screen estate is too small to do anything really interesting anyway, and power-wise it's going to be limited by the form factor as well. I have never thought of watches as being great ideas in the first place once we were carrying multi-functions devices with us (like phones), Smartwatches even less.
EDIT: as for sensors, yeah, sure, but then I don't really need a display, I'd rather access the data through other means (phone, computer via bluetooth, etc).
I haven't worn a watch in about as long either. Watches with sensors and displays do have niche value though. Look at Garmin and Suunto sports watches. Very useful for certain sports. I own a Garmin, but even then I only wear it when I need it.
I can't work out wearables though. Google glass seems to have stagnated technology wise. And all the watches seem like attempts to beat Apple at shipping a device first based on speculation.
The sensor route might be something. But even then you are talking about multiple devices due to form factor, power requirements and the simple fact that you cannot take all measurements from a device on your wrist.
I got a silver Pebble Steel about a month ago and I'm completely in love with it. Small, discrete, smart and elegantly designed, it gives me notifications without ever becoming too much. So yes, functionality is limited, but more to the point it is focused. If I want something more I can always just reach for my phone - so I don't have to contend with the overlap.
The Pebble allows me to have my Android phone on silent, displaying who's calling without having to pull the phone from my pocket, as well as emails, hangout and sms messages. Oh and by default it displays the time. This is perfect for my usage.
As opposed to the new batch of "Gear" products, the epaper display is always on, looks razor sharp, and the battery is fantastic lasting from 5 to 7 days. When my watch gets a low battery warning, I have what must be a full charge of a Gear device remaining!
Discreet = careful and circumspect in one's speech or actions, especially in order to avoid causing offense or to gain an advantage. Discrete = individually separate and distinct.
This one always gets me, especially in a mathy/technical audience that should have seen "discrete" mathematics or photons or something before.
Homophones with shared etymology are quite rare, though; so it's a reasonable mistake to make. "Discreetion", anyone?
Besides, in every other Latin-deriving language there is no such distinction. English is the exception, not the rule --and for rather obtuse reasons, at that [1]:
Spellings discrete and nativized discreet co-existed until after c.1600, when discreet became the common word for "careful, prudent," and discrete was maintained in philosophy, medicine, music and other disciplines that remembered Latin and made effort to obey it.
You are of course completely right; my language sensor tingled, but not enough. Thanks for the heads up, that would be the last time I made that mistake! I'll eat my humble pie now.. I'm a programmer, and, despite the evidence to the contrary, I do value precision of language.
Is it? I am wearing a watch, but I have no idea about the direction of the trend. Also, even if it does go down I'd expect it to go the way of the vinil. Would not be surpirsed if wearing watches will become fashionable again soon.
I've worn a wristwatch since elementary school, and I'm noticing fewer and fewer people wearing them. As a second anecdotal data point, it's getting a lot harder to find replacement batteries and bands when they wear out - it used to be you could find them in any department store or electronics store, now you pretty much need to go to a shop that specializes in watches. (For context, my watch is a utility more than a piece of jewellery, so I don't want to spend more than I spent on my $25 Timex on replacement parts.)
That said, while I've been watching the smartwatch scene with interest, I'm not particularly interested in buying one yet; maybe when the market matures to the point where I can get a decent one for under $100.
I want one. The use case I'm interested in is using it in multi-factor authentication, so not interested in things like watch faces, notifications or games.
I believe the fate of Android Wear style smart watches is highly intertwined with the proliferation and usefulness of 'contextual computing' (Google Now, etc).
Glanceable cards afford great tolerance for false positives. Combining this with advances in activity detection, indoor location tracking, and IoT opens the door for a new generation of personalized software well suited for casual wearable interaction. However it remains to be seen if the economics are there to create this brave new software ecosystem.
A smart wearable maybe, but definitely not attached to my wrists. It's too uncomfortable (25 years since I wore a watch) and monitoring my vitals doesn't matter to me, maybe when I'll be old.
Probably I could use a wearable computing device attached to my cloths. By the way, most cloths have been presciently engineered to hold those devices. They have pockets. I've got a smartphone in one of them, which is much less a phone than it is of anything else (internet browser, email client, video player, clock, game console, ebook reader and more) so I'm already into wearables together with a good chunk of the human population.
I can see me replacing a smartphone with something functionally equivalent that spares me the need of reaching to it. Not glasses, they won't be as light as the prescription glasses I'm wearing. Maybe VR contact lenses interfaced to a base device in a pocket (inspired by Vernor Vinge's Rainbows End) but unfortunately my eyes started to refuse contact lenses years ago so I'm waiting for direct neural connections :-)
If they can make VR contact lenses, I'm sure they'll be able to make very light prescription glasses with a screen component. Google Glass already only weights 50g, according to the wiki.
First of all it doesn't help they are in their infant stage (meaning: they suck), I also don't feel the huge need to be even more connected than I am today.
In fact I am doing the opposite. I'm trying to leave my phone more often as it takes away my attention at times when I should give attention to other things / people.
I find it's kinda rude when I'm at a dinner or meeting and people sit there watching their own little screen instead of actually beeing part of what's going on in the real world.
I'm guessing another screen won't make it any better.
I didn't wear a watch since 1999 (Thanks to Mobile Phones). Started using LG G Watch since Google I/O.
Its pretty useful for day to day things.
Mostly:
1. Check who is calling without taking phone out of pocket.
2. Look at email to see if I want to take my phone out and check email.
3. "OK Google" is cool to quickly check next meetings etc..
I think most people who sound negative (I used to be one of them) did not use a smart watch.
The only thing I can imagine wanting one for, if it's small and light enough, is tracking progress while I exercise. Essentially a more advanced GPS watch with a heart rate monitor. Maybe you could put those zombie run games and stuff like that on it. And music ideally, if you could do wireless headphones.
Aside from running or biking though, I have zero desire to have my email and such even more in my face than it is on my phone. Any time I'm going to interact with it for more than 5 seconds, it's going to be preferable to pull out my phone, which only takes a couple seconds anyway.
> The only thing I can imagine wanting one for, if it's small and light enough, is tracking progress while I exercise.
I've been wondering about how comfortable & practical it'll be to have a larger iPhone strapped to my arm while I run. The iPhone 5 is already kinda big. If the rumors are true and Apple's screens are getting bigger, I might need to start stuffing my phone in a waist pouch and use a wrist display like Magellan's Echo series.
That would be a great opportunity for Apple to introduce a wearable that looks better & does more.
I have been consciously using Google Now on my Android phone more and more to add notes, send messages, ask for directions, find out where I parked my car, find out the world cup scores, track incoming package deliveries, catch up on Tour de France news, etc.
The more I use it, the more utility I gain from it, but the more I find it a pain in the ass to pull out my phone (perhaps while driving, or walking, or cycling), unlock the phone, then go "OK Google. Take a note. Remember to look up details of Facebook mobile like button." or "OK Google. Message Tom mobile. On my way, see you soon."
Now knowing that there are Android wear devices out there I think "damn this would be so much easier with a watch." I'd really like to buy one now, but I think I'll hang out for the Moto 360.
I doubt there's much utility in a smart watch for those that don't utilize Google Now to the fullest.
66 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 108 ms ] threadAlthough personally I have almost all my phone notifications off anyway, so I would probably use it as little more than a regular watch.
Perhaps it's because I haven't configured my notifications well enough in the first place, but I think my smartwatch has saved me a reasonable amount of time in the last few weeks simply by allowing me to dismiss and ignore non-critical notifications without reaching for my phone.
One possible useful function for a smartwatch would be as a wireless storage device. That would mean that you don't need to upload anything to "the cloud" and can be pretty sure of having your data with you at all times. That's not much better than storing data on a phone though.
Mobile phone manufacturers and tech journalists believe a smart watch is an extension of your phone, a second screen that saves you getting your phone out to do basic things. This is the vision that will, probably, sell quite well. On the other hand, the general population believe a smart watch is a watch that does some extra fancy stuff. That dissonance is something that is going to be very difficult to overcome while 'smart watches' just look like big, ugly watches that do things your phone already does.
I think things will really get interesting when I can ditch the phone all together. Think bendable screen around your wrist which straightens out (or doesn't) when you use it.
Something no one seems to understand, is that the smartphone revolution didn't happen because we suddenly had touchscreens and processors powerful enough to have a relatively decent OS. We'd had that for years beforehand; someone would've gotten it sooner.
It was the fucking user interface.
That's all iOS did. It got the UI right. It didn't take 10 awkward actions to check your mail. You didn't have to go through complex menus to add contacts to your address book. You could browse the internet, have it be the real internet, have it feel like the real internet- and it felt manageable with the ability to zoom in and out, and properly move through web forms.
Smart watches, similar to Google Glass, are starting from zero again. They're brilliant ideas, as brilliant as the smartphone was before them. They're obvious, which is why they're brilliant. What isn't obvious, is how you make the entire experience simple.
So, are smartwatches going to take off? Probably not right now. Neither is Google Glass. There's a lot of talented UI guys involved with both, but you can't get it just half-right. It needs to feel right, and every way it feels wrong needs to feel like it's wrong in its own way, and not because it doesn't do it the way something else does. And right now, no one has either figured out that much.
In the UK at least, it's still very hard to get a sane data plan with tethering at a reasonable price.
I've been waiting for some big provider to offer true multinational mobile service at least within the EU, where the regulatory framework is similar and necessary agreements in place. But it looks like I will be waiting forever...
Not really. It is hard to imagine now, but back in 2007 the ability to pack a desktop-grade machine into the size of a chocolate bar was such an overwhelming technical leap that it literally panicked industry leaders, who didn't think it was even possible at the time [1,2]:
"Mike Lazaridis was at home on his treadmill and watching television when he first saw the Apple iPhone in early 2007. There were a few things he didn't understand about the product. So, that summer, he pried one open to look inside and was shocked. It was like Apple had stuffed a Mac computer into a cellphone, he thought.
To Mr. Lazaridis, (...) the iPhone was a device that broke all the rules. The operating system alone took up 700 megabytes of memory, and the device used two processors. The entire BlackBerry ran on one processor and used 32 MB. Unlike the BlackBerry, the iPhone had a fully Internet-capable browser. (...) RIM by contrast used a rudimentary browser that limited data usage.
(...) If that thing catches on, we're competing with a Mac, not a Nokia, he recalled telling his staff."
[1] http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/the-inside...
[2] http://www.tuaw.com/2013/12/19/when-google-engineers-first-l...
Function-wise, i don't see the point of getting one at the moment.
However, to chime into the overall discussion: I don't really see myself wearing a smart watch. The last time I've worn a watch was in 4th grade. I really never liked the feeling of wearing one even when they were lightweight and since then I also never missed wearing one, so I don't think this is going to change.
If I'm willing to pulling out my phone and looking at it just to get the time, I would assume that I'm equally willing to do that for whatever other task these smart watches can fulfil.
That said: Who knows what we're going to see in the future. Maybe there will be a killer application that would make the prospect of wearing something on my wrist actually bearable, but for now, nothing I can think of would make me want to.
I have one at my workstation at home and one at work, and never have to find the cable to charge my phone. Which also mean I'll never wear out the charging socket :)
I want a true virtual reality input that beams a 360 degree laser virtual display with a resolution of less than one arc-minute right onto my retina.
(I used to teach a children's sailing class, so I needed to tell the time in order to know when to sail back to the docks.)
Main reason I've never got around to buying a watch: I always have my phone.
In fact this brings up another thought ive been kicking around for a while: wearable computing and whether they will "fly" with audiences, the truth is, they already do - phones, whether you consider clothing or not is pretty much on your persons 24 hours a day. Its basically underwear for a lot of people. Watches, while not "smart", are computers to some extent. I think smart watches, are a natural progression but I dont see them being the next "mobile" like some would have you believe.
Personally I'm interested in all the sensors they can possibly cram into it. If they can figure out how to get blood pressure readings from it, I'll wear it 24 7. Judging from this [1] it seems a wrist device can do BP measurements.
[1] http://www.healthline.com/health-news/tech-blood-pressure-mo...
Maybe I'm the minority here, but I haven't felt the use of even HAVING a watch for like... 15 years of something. Unless you care about fashion, there's no real need to have something 24/7 on your wrist just to indicate the hour or do trivial other tasks. The screen estate is too small to do anything really interesting anyway, and power-wise it's going to be limited by the form factor as well. I have never thought of watches as being great ideas in the first place once we were carrying multi-functions devices with us (like phones), Smartwatches even less.
EDIT: as for sensors, yeah, sure, but then I don't really need a display, I'd rather access the data through other means (phone, computer via bluetooth, etc).
I can't work out wearables though. Google glass seems to have stagnated technology wise. And all the watches seem like attempts to beat Apple at shipping a device first based on speculation.
The sensor route might be something. But even then you are talking about multiple devices due to form factor, power requirements and the simple fact that you cannot take all measurements from a device on your wrist.
The Pebble allows me to have my Android phone on silent, displaying who's calling without having to pull the phone from my pocket, as well as emails, hangout and sms messages. Oh and by default it displays the time. This is perfect for my usage.
As opposed to the new batch of "Gear" products, the epaper display is always on, looks razor sharp, and the battery is fantastic lasting from 5 to 7 days. When my watch gets a low battery warning, I have what must be a full charge of a Gear device remaining!
This one always gets me, especially in a mathy/technical audience that should have seen "discrete" mathematics or photons or something before.
http://www.jzmic.com/vintage/wp-content/gallery/transistors/...
(as in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrete_circuit, see)
Besides, in every other Latin-deriving language there is no such distinction. English is the exception, not the rule --and for rather obtuse reasons, at that [1]:
Spellings discrete and nativized discreet co-existed until after c.1600, when discreet became the common word for "careful, prudent," and discrete was maintained in philosophy, medicine, music and other disciplines that remembered Latin and made effort to obey it.
[1] http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=discreet
That said, while I've been watching the smartwatch scene with interest, I'm not particularly interested in buying one yet; maybe when the market matures to the point where I can get a decent one for under $100.
Glanceable cards afford great tolerance for false positives. Combining this with advances in activity detection, indoor location tracking, and IoT opens the door for a new generation of personalized software well suited for casual wearable interaction. However it remains to be seen if the economics are there to create this brave new software ecosystem.
A smart wearable maybe, but definitely not attached to my wrists. It's too uncomfortable (25 years since I wore a watch) and monitoring my vitals doesn't matter to me, maybe when I'll be old.
Probably I could use a wearable computing device attached to my cloths. By the way, most cloths have been presciently engineered to hold those devices. They have pockets. I've got a smartphone in one of them, which is much less a phone than it is of anything else (internet browser, email client, video player, clock, game console, ebook reader and more) so I'm already into wearables together with a good chunk of the human population.
I can see me replacing a smartphone with something functionally equivalent that spares me the need of reaching to it. Not glasses, they won't be as light as the prescription glasses I'm wearing. Maybe VR contact lenses interfaced to a base device in a pocket (inspired by Vernor Vinge's Rainbows End) but unfortunately my eyes started to refuse contact lenses years ago so I'm waiting for direct neural connections :-)
First of all it doesn't help they are in their infant stage (meaning: they suck), I also don't feel the huge need to be even more connected than I am today.
In fact I am doing the opposite. I'm trying to leave my phone more often as it takes away my attention at times when I should give attention to other things / people.
I find it's kinda rude when I'm at a dinner or meeting and people sit there watching their own little screen instead of actually beeing part of what's going on in the real world.
I'm guessing another screen won't make it any better.
Its pretty useful for day to day things.
Mostly:
1. Check who is calling without taking phone out of pocket. 2. Look at email to see if I want to take my phone out and check email. 3. "OK Google" is cool to quickly check next meetings etc..
I think most people who sound negative (I used to be one of them) did not use a smart watch.
Aside from running or biking though, I have zero desire to have my email and such even more in my face than it is on my phone. Any time I'm going to interact with it for more than 5 seconds, it's going to be preferable to pull out my phone, which only takes a couple seconds anyway.
I've been wondering about how comfortable & practical it'll be to have a larger iPhone strapped to my arm while I run. The iPhone 5 is already kinda big. If the rumors are true and Apple's screens are getting bigger, I might need to start stuffing my phone in a waist pouch and use a wrist display like Magellan's Echo series.
That would be a great opportunity for Apple to introduce a wearable that looks better & does more.
I don't care what features it has specifically. If there's something useful for me I'll get one. Will I end up wearing it full time? Who knows.
The more I use it, the more utility I gain from it, but the more I find it a pain in the ass to pull out my phone (perhaps while driving, or walking, or cycling), unlock the phone, then go "OK Google. Take a note. Remember to look up details of Facebook mobile like button." or "OK Google. Message Tom mobile. On my way, see you soon."
Now knowing that there are Android wear devices out there I think "damn this would be so much easier with a watch." I'd really like to buy one now, but I think I'll hang out for the Moto 360.
I doubt there's much utility in a smart watch for those that don't utilize Google Now to the fullest.