Postmates earned 400% more on a delivery than the delivery guy
I used Postmates to buy and deliver a $199 Chromebook for me from Best Buy. The delivery fee was $5, 80% of which went to the delivery guy. Postmates added a 10% "purchase fee" which they do NOT split with the delivery guy. So they made $21 while the guy who actually did the work made $4 (not counting the tip I gave him).
I realize that developing the app that facilitated this transaction is work but for the purposes of a single transaction is it truly 400% as much work?
Does anyone else have a problem with this?
Receipt image: http://goo.gl/z4HBdv
13 comments
[ 0.27 ms ] story [ 41.3 ms ] threadSee: the diamond industry.
I imagine the delivery guy does.
It's a free market though, so if that $21 turns out to be far more than is necessary for making the SAAS site, then a competitor will see it as an opportunity and undercut them eventually. Shouldn't take long if the business model is viable.
These CRUD-on-a-service companies (Postmates, Uber, etc) aren't "disruption" but just an investment land rush to be the new rent-extracting middlemen. Let's just hope they're easily dislodged when an actual p2p economy finally develops.
Postmates creates value both for you and the delivery guy. After all - you used their service for some reason and paid for it right? You get the quality service, delivery guy gets the demand for his services.
Alternatively the delivery guy could develop an app for himself only, put it on the appstore and wait for you to download it. But he would never earn anything this way.