Seriously though, $15k is a pittance for what they're asking. If they had to employ someone to do that, they'd have to pay them way more than that, and the economic upsides of what they're gunning for are quite substantial. This feels like it's along the lines of holding a logo design contest and paying the winner $25.
Just went through the security theater myself no less than an hour ago and along with everyone else: Eliminate TSA. We all know it's a joke, I even had my pat down guy joking with me about how ridiculous the whole thing is. On the way out to my destination I had 100' of 8-wire cable in my carry on, a multi-parameter water quality probe and various solutions for calibrations (fit into the appropriate containers) and no one said anything. On the way back the multi-parameter probe was questioned like mad. Their practices are inconsistent and ineffective. However, they are effective at slowing travel down and spending tax payers monies.
> It’s asking so-called “solvers” to build on TSA’s existing PreCheck program..
They expect to add a process to a failed process and expect a different result? Ultimately they'll add one more machine, one single line that feeds into the scanners, and more promotion of the Nexus program... and in five years, another $15k for another idea that changes nothing.
I'll elaborate further on the "just abolish it" idea: let each airline manage its own security. They have every incentive to balance customer experience with meaningful security.
Especially if you leave them open to civil liability in case they are negligent and bad things happen with one of their airplanes.
I specifically fly Delta because they fly out of a terminal in my home airport that doesn't have the backscatter machines - just the metal detectors. There's never much of a line and I don't have to go through the hassle of opting out for a pat-down.
I would definitely make it a point to patronize airlines which made convenience and smooth travel a feature. Every time I travel, I sacrifice multiple hours for each direction sitting in an airport because I have to allow time for TSA incompetence. 95% of the time, I'm through security in a half hour, but sometimes it takes two hours if they have the moron squad working the x-ray, so I have to assume that every single time I travel.
If airlines were competing for my business on the basis of "consistent screening times" and "low-hassle screening", I would be delighted.
The longest I've ever spent between the front of the line and the concourse was ~2 minutes. The screening process doesn't need to get shorter, just more parallel.
Have more lanes. Hire more staff, and schedule them more evenly. Every time I've waited in an obnoxiously long line, additional lanes were extant but closed. Meanwhile there seemed to be at least 5 staff standing around doing nothing. Have them man a second lane and cut the waiting time in half?
There's no inherent reason you can't solve this problem, the limiting factors are just the size of the screening room and the payroll budget.
18 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 45.9 ms ] threadSeriously though, $15k is a pittance for what they're asking. If they had to employ someone to do that, they'd have to pay them way more than that, and the economic upsides of what they're gunning for are quite substantial. This feels like it's along the lines of holding a logo design contest and paying the winner $25.
sudo fdisk /dev/tsa
sudo mkfs.freedom /dev/tsa1
They expect to add a process to a failed process and expect a different result? Ultimately they'll add one more machine, one single line that feeds into the scanners, and more promotion of the Nexus program... and in five years, another $15k for another idea that changes nothing.
Especially if you leave them open to civil liability in case they are negligent and bad things happen with one of their airplanes.
I would definitely make it a point to patronize airlines which made convenience and smooth travel a feature. Every time I travel, I sacrifice multiple hours for each direction sitting in an airport because I have to allow time for TSA incompetence. 95% of the time, I'm through security in a half hour, but sometimes it takes two hours if they have the moron squad working the x-ray, so I have to assume that every single time I travel.
If airlines were competing for my business on the basis of "consistent screening times" and "low-hassle screening", I would be delighted.
Have more lanes. Hire more staff, and schedule them more evenly. Every time I've waited in an obnoxiously long line, additional lanes were extant but closed. Meanwhile there seemed to be at least 5 staff standing around doing nothing. Have them man a second lane and cut the waiting time in half?
There's no inherent reason you can't solve this problem, the limiting factors are just the size of the screening room and the payroll budget.