I would simplify your hollywood pitch to "Tinder + Linkedin". Or "Tinder for finding business partners". I found the current one confusing. I thought it was a new dating site inspired by Linkedin. Most people dislike linkedin and mostly see it as a necessary evil.
Without being able to try the product, this is all the feedback I can offer. Having tried other founder matching tools, as a developer, I found it was 95% MBAs/non-technical people and almost no technical ones. Which is what most people are looking for.
When I see "Tinder + LinkedIn" I think of a version of tinder that relentlessly spams users, and practically only possible to block with a filter. "Tinder for finding business partners" however sounds great
No more A-holes? Kind of a big claim to make. Combined with the "tell us who you are" line, I'd think there is some degree of manual match-making. Are candidates or companies being screened or vetted in any way? There could be a boatload of students/ amateurs masquerading as experienced professionals, and this could end up hurting the first users looking for help. (Assuming this is part of why dribbble requires invites.)
The difference between Tinder and LinkedInTinder is that Tinder is a very superficial app, and somewhat needs to be. Person A thinks Person B looks good, person B reciprocates, and they meet up for a fling. I'm not so sure that the same can work for jobs as there are a lot more variables - talent, experience, availability, personality, payment terms, etc.
I really like the idea, but I'm not sure about how it will work out. It could be an interesting tool for freelancers and businesses/people to connect, if there are a couple of the right filters (remote vs local, designers vs photographers vs illustrators vs...)
That's what I saw in the URL also. Might be worth getting a more "traditional" URL, or something that doesn't have "shat" on an obvious break in the URL.
Haha. Almost seriously, can I get a service to pay these guys to send me a notification if a person I am interested in joins their service. That way, I can avoid them for being foolish enough to trust not just one, but all of these clouds services at the same time.
Could there be a market for that? I am married but there are few services, that given a potential partner subscribed to, I would want to avoid. Anti-dating services to the rescue!
Hi greggman, actually we're working on Hatch. We just don't want to launch to crickets. We also want to get beta users and iterate the app from their feedback. I just added some screens on http://www.letshat.ch so feel free to check it out and let me know what you think :)
Going on the Quick MVP website you can read: "QuickMVP is the easiest way to test your ideas, without wasting time or money."
Just like SuperKlaus said on the thread: "So if they get enough positive feedback / sign-up they'll build it?".
That killed it for me too. I have nothing against QuickMVP. I just don't want to signup for a product that doesn't exists (also, it so happen that Hatch doesn't interest me, but that's not the point). However, had they (Hatch) been a bit more "honest" and said "We're gathering email to see if there's interest in us building this app" instead of "Request an invite", I'd bet people would be more inclined to sign-up.
Hi gouggoug, actually we're working on Hatch. We just don't want to launch to crickets. We also want to get beta users and iterate the app from their feedback.
I just added some screens on http://www.letshat.ch so feel free to check it out and let me know what you think :)
Hi andrewfong, actually we're working on Hatch. We just don't want to launch to crickets and QuickMVP is a fast way to get beta users and iterate the app from their feedback.
I just added some screens on http://www.letshat.ch so feel free to check it out and let me know what you think :)
Actually we're working on Hatch. We just don't want to launch to crickets. We also want to get beta users and iterate the app from their feedback. I just added some screens on http://www.letshat.ch so feel free to check it out :)
Will it have all the cool questions that OKC has? Will it match us with %? Will it be recommendation driven like LinkedIn? Will I be able to swipe left or right to collab or not?
Lots of wild possibilities - depending on the functionality that you decide.
Looking at the title description I was actually thinking about some really weird dating site where you have to dress professionally and... I dunno, maybe post your resume profiles to others?
39 comments
[ 0.66 ms ] story [ 132 ms ] threadWithout being able to try the product, this is all the feedback I can offer. Having tried other founder matching tools, as a developer, I found it was 95% MBAs/non-technical people and almost no technical ones. Which is what most people are looking for.
What are the other founder matching tools that you tried?
The difference between Tinder and LinkedInTinder is that Tinder is a very superficial app, and somewhat needs to be. Person A thinks Person B looks good, person B reciprocates, and they meet up for a fling. I'm not so sure that the same can work for jobs as there are a lot more variables - talent, experience, availability, personality, payment terms, etc.
I really like the idea, but I'm not sure about how it will work out. It could be an interesting tool for freelancers and businesses/people to connect, if there are a couple of the right filters (remote vs local, designers vs photographers vs illustrators vs...)
What if my personality matches well with A-holes?
Actually I'll go ask our matching algorithm. Brb!
What?
Could there be a market for that? I am married but there are few services, that given a potential partner subscribed to, I would want to avoid. Anti-dating services to the rescue!
So I kind of agree. Not interested until I know what it really is and I can't know what it really is until they build it.
Just like SuperKlaus said on the thread: "So if they get enough positive feedback / sign-up they'll build it?".
That killed it for me too. I have nothing against QuickMVP. I just don't want to signup for a product that doesn't exists (also, it so happen that Hatch doesn't interest me, but that's not the point). However, had they (Hatch) been a bit more "honest" and said "We're gathering email to see if there's interest in us building this app" instead of "Request an invite", I'd bet people would be more inclined to sign-up.
I just added some screens on http://www.letshat.ch so feel free to check it out and let me know what you think :)
So if they get enough positive feedback / sign-up they'll build it?
Have you tried meeet.co?
Who knows, we may change the name later :)
Wait, so I meet people in suits, and then fuck them?
cool idea.
Lots of wild possibilities - depending on the functionality that you decide.
What do you think about the questions on OKC? Would you take time to answer fun personality questions to find collaborators?
I think their landing page makes more sense.