This is a scathing article. An open question... Is seems like the public market is not participating in the run-ups of many companies. For example, Facebook grew on private money, not public. Are these run-ups just too small to move the industry needle? Are public markets benefiting or hurting by not being involved in as many IPOs?
In a healthy economy there is a need for bad investments. Otherwise capital would simply accumulate. Many VCs perform a service by making bad investments seem reasonable and attractive to foolish institutional investors. It isn't that easy to do. You need a plausible story about how you could generate a huge return. You need to convince people that the investment is sensible. This article makes it sound like anyone could do it, but actually I am sure it is very hard.
I like the way you think, if you're being facetious that is. But yes, without bad investments moving money from the 1% to the bourgeoisie and the petite-bourgeoisie, then it just stays trapped up there, which makes politicians turn into street-walking whores - over-eager to sell out the populace. Venture capital is the new communism. They're the new "takers" in our economic society, or perhaps the new "Robin Hoods."
And I applaud their efforts. It's not easy turning bull into gold. And there's a big difference between regular bull (the news, everything you see on all media, advertising, your co-workers' worthless opinions) and turn it into convincing bull.
3 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 23.0 ms ] threadAnd I applaud their efforts. It's not easy turning bull into gold. And there's a big difference between regular bull (the news, everything you see on all media, advertising, your co-workers' worthless opinions) and turn it into convincing bull.