Show HN: Shortwhale – Get fewer, shorter, and better emails
Underlying to all of this is the idea to put more demands on the sender (there are things to pick from a drop-down and people can create multiple-choice emails, which allows the receiver to answer with one click). However, what we found is that it can also make it easier for people to write Dan because it actually removes some demands from them: they know that he doesn't expect any formalities and the structure helps them too. And, above all, senders are more likely to get a response (and quicker).
Please have a look:
http://shortwhale.com
As an example, here's Dan's Shortwhale page (he links to it from his website and in his email signature):
http://shortwhale.com/danariely
HN, we'd love to hear what you think.
Many thanks, Dan Ariely and Dominik Grolimund
PS: If you're interested, Lifehacker published an interview with Dan where he talks about "how he works": lifehacker.com/im-dan-ariely-author-and-professor-and-this-is-how-i-1615748781
25 comments
[ 2.3 ms ] story [ 68.3 ms ] threadhttp://shortwhale.com
http://shortwhale.com/danariely
When I clicked in I was expecting this to be some sort of email filter that rewrote emails to be shorter (either by humans or by new summarizing algorithms) or a human virtual assistant to help follow some more complex rules than filters allow to help pare down inboxes. Seems like those would have a broader market.
I suspect that the force of disapproval would be just as effective as the technological force for 'meaningful' emails, but would lose effectiveness for less meaningful emails (where Dan's disapproval doesn't mean much to the sender).
If so, then the real issue may be that Dan is getting too many emails from people who don't care what he thinks. The classic way to deal with this is to have one address for people who know you (and care what you think) and another for the unwashed masses. The problem with the classic solution is that it requires someone to monitor the unwashed email, or you suffer the opportunity cost of ignoring possibly important messages from people you don't know (yet). I wonder if Dan is already using this method, and shortwhale is only for the unwashed email address, thus reducing the cost while keeping the opportunity?
Users are stupid, and email is unfortunately an overdeveloped idea from an age long past. Attempts to replace it invariably face resistance from the multitudes of users who wouldn't react well with change.
I like the idea and recognize the need for a service like this, however.
e.g. danariely@inbound.shortwhale.com -> danariely@gmail.com
Messages sent to the inbound email address receive automatic replies with a link to the site, or for bonus points, an HTML form (for email clients that aren't ancient and terrible).
Edit: It's also up on ProductHunt now: http://www.producthunt.com/posts/shortwhale
* Plain text only
* Proper subject
* No long signatures
* No nonsense
* UTF-8
This is not too different from those obnoxious anti-spam services that require you to click on a link and solve a captcha before delivering your email to the recipient. That's just a No, because you make me do extra work for your own convenience even though I am already ultimately doing you a favor by replying to your email.
In other words, this form works as a mechanism to discourage emails from people who don't need anything from the recipient.
While I appreciate that a lot of email is a problem for many people - solutions need to be aware of the preciousness of everyone's time not just yours (the recipient's).
As an average Joe, my thought process:
- I'm not going to make my friends and family contact me this way. It's just too impersonal. If a friend insisted I contact them this way, I probably wouldn't bother.
- I can't enforce this at work, as much as I'd like to. Not to mention I'm cc'd or included in on a lot of emails that go to multiple people.
But for people like Dan Ariely, this could work great.
I think that the real issue is how to create a world in which we help the people getting our email understand us better -- including if and when we need an answer.
Email is currently sorted by time, and this is not representing correctly when people should stop their work and attend to it -- shortwhale is trying to solve this.
I also don't think that shortwhale is just for busy people, since distractions are bad for all of us.
Now, I getting back to work
Dan
One request though. Could you check your gender form. I have twice changed to female, and it still shows male and refers to em as male.