I didnt know this was a common problem until today - whenever some UFO appears in the stream (might it be space waste or some other object) NASA commences technical break.
Perhaps such 'sightings' trigger an avalanche of calls, emails, FOIA requests, and lawsuits, consuming resources that are better spent on their organizational goals.
Do you have any evidence that they do in fact switch cameras every time something like that shows up? Because I seriously doubt that's true.
I downloaded the whole 2+ hours long HD video because I couldn't see the UFO you were talking about in the YouTube version. Well it turns out I could see it, I just thought you were talking about something more exciting than a round blob that rises slowly and predictably over the horizon, never moves, and has no distinguishing characteristics, but that's beside the point — the point is that in that 2+ hours video they change cameras or lose the signal several times, and at none of those other times was there any kind of "UFO" in the frame.
So, there's clear evidence that they frequently and routinely change cameras / lose the signal when there's nothing "suspicious" going on, and conversely there's no evidence (unless you have some to offer) that they purposely do it every time a UFO appears. It seems to me the more likely explanation is that out of thousands of instances of camera changes / lost signals, you've managed to find a few instances where there was coincidentally a blob of some kind in frame.
(If the intent was to cover up the existence of UFOs, why do they let the camera roll for more than a minute before changing. Perhaps the cover-up technician who's assigned to monitor the live feed was busy updating his Facebook or something.)
6 comments
[ 5.5 ms ] story [ 31.1 ms ] threadAnd here another one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAsxflfMXtg - NASA wont comment for now.
I am absolutely no sensation hunter and I am very sceptical about stuff like that, but why NASA switches cameras whenever things like that shows up?
I downloaded the whole 2+ hours long HD video because I couldn't see the UFO you were talking about in the YouTube version. Well it turns out I could see it, I just thought you were talking about something more exciting than a round blob that rises slowly and predictably over the horizon, never moves, and has no distinguishing characteristics, but that's beside the point — the point is that in that 2+ hours video they change cameras or lose the signal several times, and at none of those other times was there any kind of "UFO" in the frame.
So, there's clear evidence that they frequently and routinely change cameras / lose the signal when there's nothing "suspicious" going on, and conversely there's no evidence (unless you have some to offer) that they purposely do it every time a UFO appears. It seems to me the more likely explanation is that out of thousands of instances of camera changes / lost signals, you've managed to find a few instances where there was coincidentally a blob of some kind in frame.
(If the intent was to cover up the existence of UFOs, why do they let the camera roll for more than a minute before changing. Perhaps the cover-up technician who's assigned to monitor the live feed was busy updating his Facebook or something.)