They check against terrorist watch lists - which many people are on for secret reasons (that have not resulted in their being charged with crimes) with no process for dispute or appeal.
I have a friend named Omar -- american citizen, raised in america, mit undergrad -- who is on a watch list because of his name. That's not a common name or anything...
Kudos! We (Zenefits) just finished integrating with their API; the development process was really smooth, and Jonathan and Daniel have been great to work with.
Given that there is already a completely free API for background checks provided by the federal government... wait, is it because that API is convoluted and patently insane? So is sanity their real product?
Also, the way the federal background check system works, requests have to come from originating agencies that are set up to interface with the federal system. Is Checkr going to interface directly, or are they going to do what most companies do and go through a state agency? If going through a state agency - which one? The fee that states charges varies RADICALLY... in some states, you pay basically what the federal govt charges ($14.25). In others, they charge upwards of $300 per transaction to just submit your data and relay the answer.
Also, there is a new service called 'Rap Back' which enables someone who runs a background check to sort of subscribe to a persons background... so if new items arise, like new arrests or the like, they can be notified. Will Checkr support that?
I don't really understand the link to 'on-demand economy'... at least at the federal level, a background check will tell you nothing except whether the person has been convicted of a 'serious crime' (the definition of serious crime varies widely from state to state... in Oregon almost all traffic violations are 'serious', while in other states nothing short of murder qualifies). You don't get to know when or what crime or anything like that, just "yes" or "no". Do you really want to avoid anyone who might have had a domestic violence issue in 1972 or a speeding ticket in Oregon 20 years ago?
There are lots of services in the background check area. Checkr, at $25 per name, is kind of expensive. "backgroundchecks.com" is only $15 if you buy 10 checks.
(I have an API which does background checks on web-based businesses. See
Yeah, I really need to switch over to tiny type in light grey on dark grey, with the examples in yellow on dark grey. And stop listing all the possible values for enumeration value results; let users figure that out for themselves.
Intelius does not offer FCRA compliant background check. Employers cannot use it to screen candidates. We (Checkr) are not reselling any background checks from other providers.
Accurint, TLO and the big folks already all have API's for these. The tough part is getting access. The compliance checks are rigorous and typically it's not worth it for them to do this for people with low volumes.
It creates a nice gap in the market for someone like Checkr. As their volume grows, there's a great opportunity to shop around and even build your own.
In the TC article, Vince Wong mentions that the industry hasn't changed in several decades. The whole industry has really only existed for about 20 years, thinking back to Database Technologies and AutoTrack which was a pay by the minute dial up product into the 2000's. If he's referring to the innovation in terms of productizing an API, it's really the risk involved that's the challenge here.
I feel like it would be a lot easier for folks like LexisNexis and TransUnion to sell to someone creating this market than for them to manage the compliance that comes along with building it themselves.
So serious question here.
Since Checkr is providing API access what prevents Someone having API access to run background check on my information ?
Lots of risk actually if you ask me. Socially engineering my information and using it against me by some stupid people puts Checkr at inherent risk.
I see multi-million dollar lawsuit coming in future against Checkr.
26 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 72.4 ms ] threadAlso a lot of regulation due to FCRA (which I'm personally glad for, considering the consequences of incorrect reporting).
Hard to believe they aren't scum.
I have a friend named Omar -- american citizen, raised in america, mit undergrad -- who is on a watch list because of his name. That's not a common name or anything...
Also, the way the federal background check system works, requests have to come from originating agencies that are set up to interface with the federal system. Is Checkr going to interface directly, or are they going to do what most companies do and go through a state agency? If going through a state agency - which one? The fee that states charges varies RADICALLY... in some states, you pay basically what the federal govt charges ($14.25). In others, they charge upwards of $300 per transaction to just submit your data and relay the answer.
Also, there is a new service called 'Rap Back' which enables someone who runs a background check to sort of subscribe to a persons background... so if new items arise, like new arrests or the like, they can be notified. Will Checkr support that?
I don't really understand the link to 'on-demand economy'... at least at the federal level, a background check will tell you nothing except whether the person has been convicted of a 'serious crime' (the definition of serious crime varies widely from state to state... in Oregon almost all traffic violations are 'serious', while in other states nothing short of murder qualifies). You don't get to know when or what crime or anything like that, just "yes" or "no". Do you really want to avoid anyone who might have had a domestic violence issue in 1972 or a speeding ticket in Oregon 20 years ago?
Intelus offers on-line background checks if you sign up as an "affiliate": http://www.intelius.com/affiliates.php
So does "backgroundchecks.com": http://www.backgroundchecks.com/resellers/apiproducts
There are lots of services in the background check area. Checkr, at $25 per name, is kind of expensive. "backgroundchecks.com" is only $15 if you buy 10 checks.
(I have an API which does background checks on web-based businesses. See
http://www.sitetruth.com/doc/sitetruthapi.html
Currently free.)
I like it.
I do however like your point.
It creates a nice gap in the market for someone like Checkr. As their volume grows, there's a great opportunity to shop around and even build your own.
In the TC article, Vince Wong mentions that the industry hasn't changed in several decades. The whole industry has really only existed for about 20 years, thinking back to Database Technologies and AutoTrack which was a pay by the minute dial up product into the 2000's. If he's referring to the innovation in terms of productizing an API, it's really the risk involved that's the challenge here.
I feel like it would be a lot easier for folks like LexisNexis and TransUnion to sell to someone creating this market than for them to manage the compliance that comes along with building it themselves.
I see multi-million dollar lawsuit coming in future against Checkr.
Here comes the start-up bubble.