21 comments

[ 5.3 ms ] story [ 57.2 ms ] thread
(comment deleted)
This so reminiscent of Japanese robotic kits. Just look at the assembly process from the beginning of the video ... damn :) My dad got me a simple clap-and-it-walks robot kit when I was 8 or 9 and I still remember the insane excitement of putting it together... It was a one-time thing, but the rush of making something physical and complex from a pile of simple parts is really something. Especially when it actually works in the end.

I mean, this sort of thing has virtually no immediate practical value, but it is such a treat for anyone who likes to tinker with things.

I wonder if a 3d printer hot end could be added to this thing? It'd be the perfect (ie cost-effective) way to print small figures (eg minis for wargames)!
You would need to move it (or the print) on the z-axis as well. And printer heads are usually quite big and heavy, I'm not sure if they can get small enough for this.
The Piccolo seems to be a 3-axis machine, i.e. it can already do that since lifting the pen is quite essential when drawing.

However, I guess it can't control the extrusion rate dimension that a 3D printer has, so it would still fall a bit short.

Use the CNC to move the stage, not the head.
Look at the spiral it's drawing. It has way too much play, like several mm.
Too bad this is not open source but CC by-nc-sa.
My thoughts exactly.

I hate when companies call it open hardware, but then turn around and say 'non-commercial use only'.

You can't commercially sell the bots, but their output is fair game. Think of it like a GPL'd compiler. This seems reasonable to me.
Except you can sell a GPL compiler.
If you get the parts cut via the linked online place ( ponoko ) it costs $48 just to get the cut parts. This obviously doesn't include the rest of the parts. Buying all the needed parts for this would cost $130 ( am including the $48 here ) each if you build them yourself. You'd have to build at least 5 to get this price. Realistically making one of these would cost around $200.

It will never be sold commercially, since the designs are CC by-nc-sa.

Unless you are hardcore about building cute expensive tech toys, best move along.

In capability it appears to basically be a "flat eggbot" and an eggbot costs $200. I bought one on sale back in '11 and have been inking a new personalized christmas ornament with it every season since then (more or less).

As a tool, its hourly cost has gotten pretty low compared to other toys. If I could find a similar recreational activity for this device, I'm just saying past experience shows that something similar ends up as a reasonable financial deal.

I agree that it may in fact be reasonable to pay $150 ( perhaps even $200 ) for such a thing. The real cost is much higher due to a need to solder components. This is an especial blocker for people with no soldering experience.

Really, the whole thing would make sense if it had a full cost breakdown to make a single one of them, getting the parts mostly from one location, rather than a random mix, many requiring a minimum purchase of X of them, instead of one.

It's a really cool project, it is just unclear exactly how much effort and money it would cost to make one of these. ( and what tools would be needed )

i have a small cnc machine. i wonder if i can adapt the model to be cut out from that.
It would be better to build a drawbot with 3 servos and an arduino.
For a second there, I thought it would be about a Command and Control Bot, and was really intrigued ....
Does anyone remember playing with the Logo programming language in the 80's and being able to control a "turtle" robot that had a pen attached and was able to pretty much do the same?
Yes. I learned recursion from drawing "trees" with it when I was about 12...
I know there is a huge coolness factor to this but why do I need 3-axis moving thing to do 2-axis drawings? Can't I just use software to print them out straight out of printer?