Supreme Court won't hear dispute over Sherlock Holmes (bostonherald.com) 2 points by fr0sty 11y ago ↗ HN
[–] fr0sty 11y ago ↗ Previous discussions:310 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=697241189 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8139669
[–] RexRollman 11y ago ↗ Glad to hear this but it shouldn't have been necessary in the first place. The outcome was obvious.
2 comments
[ 4.7 ms ] story [ 17.9 ms ] thread310 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6972411
89 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8139669