> Instead of celebrating one of humanity's biggest achievements, Matt got tons of negative criticism for wearing an apparently offensive shirt, designed by his (female) friend.
Not mutually exclusive.
> The message they want to convey is that people (when they really mean women) should not be judged by how they dress - but at the same time attack a man, wait for it,... because of his shirt! Double standards, methinks.
Complete distortion of both the argument against the shirt and the concept of "she was asking for it" and he was acting in a position as a representative.
> It's almost a wearable altar to a woman's body.
Oh so it was a compliment. Why didn't women take it as a compliment! Just like catcalling right?
3 comments
[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 12.6 ms ] threadNot mutually exclusive.
> The message they want to convey is that people (when they really mean women) should not be judged by how they dress - but at the same time attack a man, wait for it,... because of his shirt! Double standards, methinks.
Complete distortion of both the argument against the shirt and the concept of "she was asking for it" and he was acting in a position as a representative.
> It's almost a wearable altar to a woman's body.
Oh so it was a compliment. Why didn't women take it as a compliment! Just like catcalling right?