Ask HN: "Math is hard!" - The limits of individiual mathematical ability
However, Physics did not come naturally to me like other math classes. On the first test (speed/velocity), the teacher told me I got the highest grade out of all his students. It got progressively worse as the material got more difficult. Combined with the fact that it was almost senior year, I almost failed a semester or two.
In college, I was absolutely awful with math proofs. Awful. Like I would stare at the sheet of paper and not even know where to start. I took one class involving them (inear algebra) and decided this was way too hard to continue my Math career. A really hard statistics class was similarly very hard (a regular stats class was quite easy.) Not sure if that was because the textbook and teacher were hard to understand.
I'm revisiting many things though. I did very poorly in high school for english and now I have writing clients on odesk. So it makes me think - what are my true abilities with math?
Math is partially IQ related. That cannot be denied.
9 comments
[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 32.9 ms ] threadi think a lot of what it comes down to for me - and maybe you - is mental discipline (staying focused for more than an hour without straying), knowing that it is very common for it to be tough, and learning how to play with math and explore it. i was never taught those things (or at least i never learned them), and so i have had to learn them the hard way. maybe you suffer from some of the same hurdles? try and overcome them, it's worth it.
as for writing proofs, one of those mathematicians got me interested in this book:
http://www.amazon.com/How-Prove-Structured-Approach-2nd/dp/0...
Math is many things. Math is arithmetic. Math is geometry. Math is algebra. Math is topology. Math research is proofs. Math calculation is quite different.
Physics uses math, but physics has is own set of concepts. Solid state physics uses different concepts than particle physics, and both are different than astrophysics or biophysics. A lot of learning physics is to understand those models, and only part of that is to understand the math used to make the models.
That you could calculate math doesn't mean that you could do proofs, or think like a physicist. I say the last with experience - I found as a physics graduate student that my math undergrad meant I could follow the math, but I had problems with the intent.
"what are my true abilities with math?" - My belief is that if you believe there are 'true abilities' then the first time you stumble you will start to believe that you don't have those abilities, and that will keep you from going further, when the more likely answer is that you need to practice more, and learn more, and ask for help in understanding.
Mind you, there's plenty of other things in the world besides learning math. You may decide to take up watercolors. Or waltz. Or study history.
I knew physics students who found calculus infinitely easier than doing trigonometry proofs. But there's others for whom the very idea of calculus is horrifying, and statistics and calculus were literally different tracks entirely when I was in school because it was pretty common for people to utterly fail to get one even if they could ace the other.
It is common knowledge that math is hard. But it's not common knowledge that art is just as hard. Did you ever try to compose a song like Beethoven, to paint a picture like Van Gogh or to rap like eminem? Probably you did, but did you succeed? If you don't have affinity with a task, you will find it hard to invest your capacities to finally get a good result. It's the same with mathematics.
So why do people see mathematics as special? It is not because it is exceptionally hard. It is because of two reason.
1. We can determine the correctness of a piece of mathematical work.
2. Society forces everybody to learn mathematics to a much higher degree than art.
So what can we do about these points? In regard to the first, I'd say that it's an advantage of mathematics and other areas should take it as an ideal.
The second reason is a consequence of the unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics to predict nature. There is nothing I can say about this besides observing it.
E.g. for many people, literature classes or some other humanities stuff is hard.
That doesn't mesh with my personal experience. I know some very, very smart people, who have found the process itself interesting and fun, but who still find it hard and also don't think they're that good at it. Perhaps your personal experience is difference, but I've seen that interesting and fun does not preclude subjective feelings of hardness.