Ask HN: Examples of profitable little free web tools?
I love to build small tools that do something useful. But they do not offer enough value to charge for them. Imagine tools like "When will the sun rise today in city X" or "How much taxes are in $X" etc. Some of them are used by tens of thousands of people a month. And I get a lot of "thank you, that's cool and useful" emails.
So far I'm not making any money from them. When I slap adsense on them, I only make a few bucks. Like $0.5 per 1000 visitors. Even if I optimized that to $2 per 1000 visitors, it still would be just around $150/month for all my websites.
But since I love doing these little, interesting projects, I will probably make more of them anyhow. Most of the projects I have in mind are little tools that cater my own curiosity. Nothing people would pay for. Like "find all xkcd comics related to a topic" and stuff like that.
Do you guys think there is a way to make a living like this? Are there any examples of profitable websites, created by one guy that have some informative value but not so much that people would pay for it?
126 comments
[ 3.9 ms ] story [ 222 ms ] threadAt the very least, their authors don't venture into a business development consulting advising on how to sell to the enterprises based on their vast experience selling a piece of trivial software to the schoolteachers.
Use your experience with what you do to create books and other resources for people who might like to do what you do.
Create a hosting service that is structured to support that community really well.
Etc.
You could try accepting donations or use it to build your portfolio for consultancy projects.
As is Kevin Lynagh's http://keminglabs.com - He also made Denizen (I think) https://getdenizen.com/
I have no idea if any of these are profitable, but at least you get some ideas. Searching "site:news.ycombinator.com microbusiness" also brings up some good examples, for instance: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7367243
http://justinvincent.com/page/1421/bootstrappers-kickstarter...
http://microisv.com/ - hasn't been updated in forever, but some good content
I couldn't think of it when I wrote the above comment, but "microISV" is the term you want to search for. Stands for "micro independent software vendor"
On the ton of traffic side, there are a lot of examples, but Google has nuked countless of those over time.
eg: http://www.markosweb.com/
They were once one of the top ~1,000 sites in the world, and that site was generating over a million dollars per year via AdSense. They'd show up for nearly any search for a random domain / site in google. A lot of sites were using that domain info technique to spam traffic (they'd show things like pagerank, alexa rank, estimated value, blah blah).
Well that concept is still functional, just not as lucrative. Today you can find "sites like X" sites that are plentiful in the serps. There is still a lot of traffic in it.
Some presently still successful examples (some are spammy, some are less so; Google has hit some of these hard this year; if you asked most of these sites, they'd claim they're valuable tools):
http://www.semrush.com
http://www.network-tools.com
http://www.ip-adress.com
http://www.prchecker.info
http://www.intodns.com
http://who.is
http://www.aboutus.org
http://www.similarsites.com
Why just look at this high quality content I pulled off of page six of their Google results:
http://www.semrush.com/info/pornoorzl.com
Or
http://www.semrush.com/info/streamingbet.com
There are millions of more pages like that. It's content spam. Hopefully Google does the right thing and adjusts their traffic accordingly.
I estimate the site has several thousand subscribers because I personally know quite a few people that subscribe. Many (most?) college basketball coaches also subscribe to the site[1]. There is also a page in the subscriber section that shows a breakdown of subscriber's favorite teams by percentage. Based on how small the percentage changes when you select a team, you can infer a rough number of subscribers that way too.
[1] NY Times article about coaches using the site (before it required a subscription): http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/24/sports/ncaabasketball/24nc...
If you want to catch a bolt out of the blue, getting together a coherent commercially valuable audience increases your chances. That said: the easiest and best way to make money is to make something people want and trade it to them for money. If you're smart enough to build something that 50k web developers use every month then turning that into six figures is straightforward.
P.S. "They do not offer enough value to charge for" is a solvable problem, either by adding value or by using equivalent engineering time to build solutions to problems that matter to people with money. I mean, it's not like BCC's for loop and random number generator are a commandingly high bar of technical prowess to justify the $29.95 price tag.
He documented the development process from soup to nuts here: http://www.kalzumeus.com/start-here-if-youre-new/
The broad strokes of making money from a tight, commercially relevant audience: collect their email addresses by promising you'll send them something valuable, send them something valuable, continue doing so, offer them the opportunity to purchase something one step more advanced than that for a meaningful amount of money.
This may or may not be achievable from the position you're in, since "50k visitors across a portfolio of websites" is possibly quite different in character from "50k highly paid professionals with congruent interests who make a habit of coming to your site to solve a problem which implies the existence of a second problem that has an active market in solutions available and lots of money sloshing around in customer acquisition budgets among them."
All of the sub phrases there suggest valuable things to shoot for in new projects, by the way. Given the choice between a website which could be used by anyone in St. Louis or anyone in a well-paid profession of equivalent size, pick the second. Given the choice of serving nail artists or lawyers, pick lawyers. Given the choice of solving a problem which is peripheral to their interests or one which is more central, pick the central one. Given the choice of "totally noncommercializable" versus "abuts a very commercial field", pick the second one. etc
† http://www.adventureppc.com/most-expensive-adwords-2014/
I worked for a company that managed adwords for a mainframe software company and they would pay a lot of money for clicks before getting a conversion.
Maybe you guys are just using different terms here.
e.g., when will the sun rise in city x -> send me an email 5 minutes before the sun rises in city x (because I told my girlfriend who's working overseas that I'd call her when the sun came up).
There is probably value in what you're doing. The trick is to find out who values it, for how much, and how can they pay you a possibly tiny amount with low payment overhead.
Grow your community, give back, deliver something unique that you can provide on a regular basis.
The reality is you don't own anything if you work for a company. But if you have 100 or 1000 mailing list opens - that is all yours.
The rhetorical question is do you want to make $12,000 a year or $120k/year. The catch hear is $120k is salaried and NOT geometrically scalable while the $12k refers to your own sales/ad revenue. That what you own and have built is scalable.
It is all about influence and/or providing what people want.
Can you provide a few more examples of aggregation / filtering services that have achieved reasonably high profitability? Always interesting to see what other people do that I don't!
In general, the aggregation / filtering services that I like have that more as a feature of their site rather than being its sole focus. That means, aggregation / filtering is definitely done with a more human touch, editorial bent.
This one is owned by the Chronicle of Higher Education and is not necessarily about profits.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arts_%26_Letters_Daily
And, we cannot forget the grand-daddy of all tech aggregation sites.
http://techmeme.com
And where would the Internet be with 'X and you won't believe what happened next' and 'N things you should now about Y'.
BuzzFeed has an 'area' full of people (not 'room' because it is Open Plan) who actively look for content that is going viral/could go viral. To their credit, they are using their top-10 (Comscore) ranking and going after more serious journalism.
keep a close eye on what sticks and then iterate and polish.
also ...maybe structure your mini-products under companies in such a way that if an acquirer came along you could sell it for a decent chunk of change.
It's not perfect in a lot of ways - no recurring revenue - but it's done way better than any of those fun projects ever have, in terms of making money. I've also learned a lot more because I have real customers that get angry if things go wrong, or are very happy when things go right because I'm solving something that's a real problem for them.
Congrats on your success.
Google "send to dropbox", this site is #1. Guaranteed income to some extent just because of that. People need to build a great product, but that's not enough. You have to get it in front of alot of people. Try to do this same thing today, dropbox will slap you down.
Get in early on some area with a bright future, before the crowd - AND build a great product, I would think better than just build a great product.
It's not like he's a Kardashian or something. He's delivering a valuable service to businesses, and they pay him in return. If you do that, you will make money too.
Thanks!
1. Content Development: Build a linkable asset (content or tools that people are compelled to share). 2. Outreach: Develop a targeting list of people who would likely link to your tool, and nurture a relationship with them. 3. Get Rich.
Packaged right, to the right company, you can probably charge $5k-$20k for the tool and another $5k/Month for outreach.
http://www.calculateme.com/
Basically, he published a bunch of calculators, got lots of links, built up pagerank (not a relevant metric anymore), and than built out unique content pages/ local directory for car insurance, and sold leads for a commission.
Strategies like this where the content and links are not relevant to the category (i.e. calculators to car insurance) probably don't work anymore...
But, if you can find an industry that is relevant to your tools, it should work really nicely, especially if you deploy it on their website under a resources section.
Donation model being a sustainable source of revenue is an urban legend. Just look at Cobian Backup - really popular, of a decent quality, massive install base, donation-based model - the author ultimately gave up (after several years!) and put it up on sale, because donations just didn't work at all.
Alot of it has to do with how and who you ask.
If this guys is getting emails from people thanking him for making it, I am sure a well crafted message saying, "we can only continue creating these great tools with your generous support."
Here is a blog post I wrote about that stanford story. http://www.davidmelamed.com/2013/01/15/theres-no-excuse-for-...
It's not shocking money at all, but it's honestly more than I expected from a donation link.
https://flattr.com/