3 comments

[ 4.4 ms ] story [ 13.6 ms ] thread
(Disclaimer - I am the owner of Mechanical CSS)

Thought I would open the discussion here - who actually likes the syntax used in these libraries? Personaly I'm not a fan of extending the language syntax for new features. Adding new features I like but at least try and stick to CSS's style.

(Comparison - http://github.com/stuartloxton/Mechanical-CSS/)

i tried csscaffold, but ran into nothing special yet. despite a minor bug it just worked. the biggest nuisance is that my ide (currently netbeans) reports lots of errors in the scaffolded css file because of course it's not valid css anymore.
<?php header('Content-type: text/css'); ?>

Knock yourself out!