Pretty clearly the issue is that it's proprietary. It's astounding this is still the case. Has Wolfram ever given his reasoning behind this? Presumably he wants to capture enterprise customers, but there are other ways to do that (optimized compilers, specialized featuresets, virtual machines, IDE licensing, support, etc.) In this day and age, there is no reason for a programming language to be closed source.
The "starter" edition is $1,000 and the standard edition is $2,500.
That pretty much kills any sort of use for side projects or lifestyle businesses until after getting significant traction...by which time most people realize python and numpy/scipi is plenty good enough.
13 comments
[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 39.0 ms ] threadNow if I was establishing a hedge fund, maybe it might be worth it?
That pretty much kills any sort of use for side projects or lifestyle businesses until after getting significant traction...by which time most people realize python and numpy/scipi is plenty good enough.
(Of course I'm not saying you want to base a business on that, but just that it's a cool way to get Mathematica and play with it.)