12 comments

[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 22.3 ms ] thread
It's good to see FreeBSD moving up. Maybe it's time to give ArchBSD a try?
I would definitely sign up for a FreeBSD droplet, I haven't found a *BSD VPS anywhere near what I'm paying comparable to the specs of a couple OpenVZ Debian GNU/Linux nodes (512MB Ram/50Gb Disk/2TB net) $15/yr. I would hope OpenBSD adoption would soon follow to host many of my services in a more default hardened OS.
Er, seems odd to be using OpenVZ if security/hardening is what you're after.

The shared kernel is a larger attack surface compared to KVM or Xen, and the OpenVZ host admin can easily see/manipulate your running processes.

No hate for OpenVZ though, I've used it constantly for about 4 years, but it makes me nervous when its discussed in a multi-tenant context.

ah indeed.. security isn't my focus on those nodes, running a couple of test server applications.
Why do you think a shared kernel is somehow more secure than a hypervisor?
Me? My point was that HV/PV virtualization is likely to be more secure than OpenVZ, sorry if it was unclear.
Have you seen vultr.com? There's also atlantic.net and dediserve.com for comparison.
The key part is the last sentence:

"In regards to FreeBSD, we’ve begun the work necessary to get it supported in DO. We’ve already begun testing it internally and hope to launch within the next 2 months."

Finally!

Yeah at first its a lot to read but at least it gets to it at the end :)
I used to have a Linux VM on DigitalOcean. At times it became unreachable, there were some downtimes here and there. I decided to go back to FreeBSD (I used to have a FreeBSD VM on John Companies), and did some research. Vultr.com came up at the top, so I moved to them. Two months in, so far so good.
Until this actually happens for DigitalOcean, if you want to mess around with FreeBSD right away, you should just check out the Atlantic.net $.99 a month Go Plan.