Why you should think twice about Freelancer.com
I first noticed several projects involving money exchange posted on Freelancer.com and opened tickets having noticed this to be strange. This indicated a strong message - There is a major security issue that a set of people are exploiting. While I reported it in vain and felt sad for those who were going to fall for this one but didn't realize I would be the one to be scammed very soon.
I had several projects (all web development) I was invited to and paid for which were suddenly reversed without any intimation. The reason provided was that the payments were made using stolen credit cards which they somehow expected me to be aware of!
When I planned to move out of it is when I realized a bigger problem. I had grown as a freelancer and earned a reputation that warranted paying the fees that I did. I had built a level of trust that does not come with portfolios of hundreds of projects or testimonials from people on your website. Because, well, there is no authenticity.
But by growing within freelancer, I had neglected forming my offline network. I did have a good client base I had got from there but not enough to sustain without new ones as the work was never regular. I had missed a very important step : creating a brand for myself outside of a third-party platform. Ensuring a good client base outside and ensuring that you use these platforms to only supplement you.
After raising the issue of multiple reversals, I was contacted by senior staff and compensated with a subscription and promised that I could always check with support team to find if a user was genuine. Shockingly, I was no longer allowed to withdraw funds and the support team do not respond to any questions regarding the same!
70 comments
[ 6.8 ms ] story [ 94.2 ms ] threadAlso there is an issue with 3rd world developers who are making impression that freelancers should be paid dime on a buck.
From client side there are different horror stories when clients are scammed into accepting low-rate bidder, and get burned heavily, and then either turn back from these platforms, or turn to accepting only bids from local country.
Are you sure? Elance and ODesk "merged", but I thought they were still competitors with Freelancer.
My experiences with Freelancer.com were awful:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5177951
When you say you undervalued yourself, what was the rate you were charging on freelancer?
The situation in Argentina is good if you get paid in cash because the black market pays twice the official (and artificial) rate. I guess it is not so good if you are being paid through a prepaid card like payoneer.
The sites like Freelancer and oDesk are saturated with highly competitive, cheap developers from Asia anyway. It's annoying. Nothing against Asians, but I wouldn't try to dive into a pool of them to get work. It's unrealistic in most cases, because they eat up opportunity like machines -- in large numbers.
Better off just cold calling.
Depending on what you're doing, you can Google businesses that need help, get their contact details, and go to town. See a business with a busted site? Check for their contact details, call them up or email them, try to get a response, convince them of why they need you to build them a better site.
Cold call.
I believe the marketing company were on retainer by a number of web agencies, and when they found a lead, they referred it to the most appropriate agency (for a percentage commission) - the agency then continued the sales process (e.g. with a pitch, an RFP response, etc).
I suspect there are a few reasons this model worked:
* The marketing company maintained their database over the long term, so they could discuss previous developments, plans the customer was making, etc.
* Providing leads to a number of web agencies (rather than each agency having a small in-house telemarketing team) gave the marketing company a greater economy of scale, which meant they could afford to invest in tools and training that were specific to telemarketing.
* Providing leads to a number of web agencies allowed the marketing company to generate revenue (commission) from a more diverse set of needs, e.g. sharepoint projects to one agency, wordpress projects to a different agency, etc. If a small agency were doing their own telemarketing, their conversion rate would generally be lower, because they would end up missing out on potentials leads, from not having a particular specialisation.
Thanks for sharing! I generally take longer-term gigs, so consistent dealflow isn't as big an of an issue for me. OP, what are you planning to do to fix your offline-network problem?
I've unsubscribed from gun.io and can't really recommend it because you won't find any work on it. The experience has been consistent across many freelancers and it's not at all what it is advertised to be.
It might make sense to limit proposals to one at a time,so the job poster must reject a proposal before he can see another one.
In other words, these sites are sites where a specific commodity--dirt cheap developer labor--is bought and sold. You'll almost certainly do better in the commodity market of well-paid, but not as plentiful, developers in your home country.
You can't advertise the work you've done through freelancer.com as your own?
I had much much better results with a monthly 'looking for a freelancer' thread on HN, and instead of writing the cover letters there, I spent time on studying and improving my skills.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5177951
To summarize: I had a big project, that was not delivered after a several milestones, so the developer canceled the project, took the escrow, and I couldn't even leave a feedback!
We are starting Dreamlance, a curated marketplace for projects and professionals.
Here are 3 ways how Dreamlance is different from all other “curated” marketplaces:
1. The Dreamlance Team actually vets each project that gets posted on our boards
- We make sure the project description is complete - We make sure the project deliverables are crystal clear - We make sure the project cost matches the effort required
We put in all this effort so that you don’t have to spend a third of your time qualifying leads. We qualify, prepare and polish them for you.
2. We provide a hassle-free & secure payments platform via escrow
- You begin work only when the project owner funds the agreed upon milestone - Once the conditions for the milestone completion are met, we release the funds to you
This way you don’t have to worry about chasing down unpaid invoices
3. We provide highly qualified assistance in resolving conflicts - In the event of a conflict of opinion between you and the project owner, we step in and provide unbiased arbitration - We ourselves have seen sticky situations in the middle of a project, and we believe our arbitration expertise will be of immense value to you
For these premium services, we would be charging you only 7.5% of the project cost, an industry low.
I strongly believe Dreamlance will soon become your preferred platform for professional freelancing.
To sign up with us, please visit http://dreamlance.io/apply
And we are happy to have your referrals :)
If you have any questions, please feel free to email me at rishi@dreamlance.io
Does that mean that the freelancer and the project owner both pay 7.5% each?
/sarcasm
What is your source on that stat?
here is my conclusion: whatever you do, you will always end up having problems with those kind of site.
Either the escrow can be reverted, or the site side with the "employer", how about installing that odesk thing that take a screenshot of your desktop every few minutes ? and on, and on, etc.
I worked as a freelancer without such web sites for 10+ years (both in France and UK), either solo by networking etc. or via an agent that was finding clients for me in exchange of a 20% commission (yes that's not a typo) and this was 10 times better that any freelancer web site.
So what is the real problem ?
you (the freelancer) are actually the product
so called "employers" can play the game "let's find the cheapest product" (eg. let's hire a freelancer that can work for $8/hour in some other country)
you can not do any margin with a competition toward "cheap" either you invoice per hour, so even if you do the job faster than someone else you just invoice the actual hours, or you bid on a fixed price which is also a race to lowest amount of money.
It is absolutely a no-win situation
as an individual or a company wether you're building web sites, applications, mobile apps, etc. all those things have high values it is absolutely OK to invoice more that the time it took you to do it eg. make a margin to make a living
also those sites tend to concentrate "bad clients" eg. the one who don't understand technology, why it cost so much to do this, why you can not build something complicated in 10 minutes, etc. exactly the kind of clients you try to avoid at all cost
I only really had problem with 2-3 guys who said they were good, but you know during the job they were Googling answers to the problems I had and had no real experience, but for the most part, some great programmers there.
I recommend ODESK, as a buyer, I am super protected from people not following through, so i have some confidence, aside from hiring locally for temp/programming work, I always use Odesk.
This is why if you're a programmer of any substance, you should avoid oDesk.
LOL, what an asshole.
Unfortunately most of clients don't realize that it's not possible to get a quality work for $20 per hour or even less. They get frustrated and disappointed in a whole idea of hiring a freelancer.
P.S. If you need a reliable person for your Python or Javascript work – just drop me a line ;-) http://careers.stackoverflow.com/msamoylov
I know of several good developers that started out on those sites, but were quickly snatched full-time by companies that realized they were good.