14 comments

[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 42.6 ms ] thread
If they wanted to make sure everybody and their grandmother starts doing this on a regular basis ... well done !
I assume you mean the airlines?

The airlines, in a strict sense, don't care. They'll set whatever prices the market can bear. If the market demands that flights from LAX to JFK are no more expensive than flights from LAX via JFK to Elbonia, they'll just raise prices on LAX to Elbonia, because LAX to JFK is a vastly bigger market. It's the Elbonians who lose, not the airlines.

A little complicated? Must have to get luggage, which is usually booked all the way through.
About 20 lines down the story:

"The trick only works with one-way flights. Travellers cannot check in any luggage as that would then travel on to the flight's final destination."

Chicago to Paris with only carry-on could be tough. Also, better get on early in case the overhead fills up and they "check" your luggage.
Gate checked bags aren't checked to your destination, you retrieve the bag plane-side upon landing.

Besides, checking bags is rarely necessary. I spent five weeks in India on business with only a carry-on suitcase and a laptop bag.

There is a section labeled, "No Luggage", and line that says:

    The trick only works with one-way flights. Travellers    
    cannot check in any luggage as that would then travel 
    on to the flight's final destination.
This is why most airlines won't let you short-check bags to an intermediate city.

Also, in the event of IRROPs, you have no guarantee that the airline will still send you through the same connecting airport. If you're trying this on a ticket with (e.g.) United from Boston to Milwaukee via Chicago, intending only to fly as far as Chicago, you could easily find yourself going through Newark or Cleveland if Chicago is snowed in or that flight has mechanical problems.

In that case, connecting in Chicago was essentially an implementation detail, United is free to reroute you through any other hub (even Houston or Denver if that's where they've got open seats). I've certainly had more out-of-the-way reroutes with United.

(edit again, just to add more)

You could even wind up on a completely different airline. United could stick you on a Delta flight through Detroit. Many ways to screw yourself.

I recently noticed DTW -> PHL was over $400 more on United than DTW -> PHL -> NYC. (For me, worst case scenario would be having spend an extra three hours on a train back to Philly.)

It would be nice to know what percent of flights have a problem that causes a reroute, so we could do the math on wether it is worth it.

UA doesn't fly DTW-PHL. Do you mean US or DL?

The airline can claw back miles, ban you from flying or, if you're a repeat abuser, go after you for the fare difference.

You're right, it was US Air.