Ask HN: Is free trial or a limited free version better?
I have a SaaS (let's people extract data from pdfs and video files) that offer a 14 day trial. The trial is severely limited, the amount of job one can complete in this period is slow on purpose. I have some customers complaining that it's too slow and give up entirely. But I explain that this is the trial, you are sharing resources with other people.
Should I have a free plan instead with the same limited features? (slow and shared rate of job completion)?
Or should my trial plan have limits removed? Let them use it to the full extent for 14 days. My worry is that somebody will get their money's worth in 14 days and choose not to buy afterwards. Should I include 'demo evaluation' messages in the data they extract?
My rationale is to make it slow and limited until they decide to upgrade. But this might or might not be happening?
9 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 32.1 ms ] threadAnother option, limit the trial to 3, 5, 7 days, but let it be full extent.
If your output is csv or some raw data this adding a text message is pretty useless. Maybe you could instead limit the output to only the first page or first 3 pages, this way again it shows the full power and speed but limits the output to help entice an upgrade.
Just a few other points, with SaaS there are always people that will get what they need out of a free trial and never sign up, or they will intentionally sign up for a month and then cancel. I know I have done it and will do that in the future if I need to. So a certain amount of this type of churn is normal and expected. Maybe you also want to evaluate the numbers too. Lastly, if the people complaining aren't yet customers and are a small number of overall prospects then maybe this really isn't an issue and is just noise. Not all comments require a change.
I would not advise offering a free version, they will be a drain on your support resources and you'll end up hating them. Or at least, I did :) - it is a lot easier to deal with an annoying user knowing they are paying your bills.
"For a limited time, use * free for 24 hours", then inside the product, push hard from them to pay, have a countdown somewhere very visible for when their license expires.
it sounds annoying but I think it will increase your conversions tenfold.
The spreadsheet would be just images of text.
So if you offer a slow, limited version is it helping your potential customer to do so? No, by making things difficult you're just manufacturing frustration.
From the other comments, it seems visitors need only a couple of hours to evaluate it. So why not make it a free trial available only for 1 day or for 3 uses?
Your fear("my worry is that somebody will get their money's worth in 14 days and choose not to buy afterwards) implies to me that you're not sure how your product fits in the user day-to-day workflow. If users would use it for 14 days and leave, the problem is not in the free trial, it is in failing to provide value and engage users.
So how can you change your product/free trial to engage users, getting them to realize value of your product, and creating habits for them to come back to your product?
I wrote an article recently into designing free trials, it might be of interest to you: http://www.saasfoundry.io/blog/design-saas-free-trial/
Good luck!
You could also have the trial based on how many files they can process instead of how long they have access. If it takes only one file for a potential customer to have the aha moment, enforce a "one file" trial. If it takes three, let it be three.
From what you've said, your service lets people extract data from files. Unless your customers have an ongoing need to process files, it might make sense to test a different pricing strategy instead of a SaaS one. This may also help you differentiate from your competitors who I presume have SaaS plans as well.
Also, if you can post a link to your service, maybe HN can give you better advice.