[–] fithisux 11y ago ↗ I personally would make a go 2.x release buildable with last Go 1.? and go 3.x buildable with last go GO 2.? [–] astrodust 11y ago ↗ At some point it would make more sense to just go with a binary bootstrap option. Nobody expects you to compile gcc out of thin air. You'll have to cross-compile it, and Go does a great job of that already.
[–] astrodust 11y ago ↗ At some point it would make more sense to just go with a binary bootstrap option. Nobody expects you to compile gcc out of thin air. You'll have to cross-compile it, and Go does a great job of that already.
2 comments
[ 5.5 ms ] story [ 18.5 ms ] thread