2 comments

[ 2.3 ms ] story [ 15.5 ms ] thread
While the headline is accurate, the reality is much more interesting. The first stage did return, it made it back to the landing barge (a pretty small target) and failed to land on the barge.

So from a debugging standpoint, interesting questions are what was the closing speed with the barge (how hard did it "land")? This is interesting because if nothing else one could consider an alternate landing structure of a net or other support structure where the final energy exchange is handled by an arrestor net of some sort.

What did telemetry say about what altitude the rocket thought it was at vs the barge? This is the one I would be most interested in if I were at SpaceX, 'sea level' is not nearly as precise as one might expect, there are tides, there are ocean swells, etc. So the actual distance to the barge has to be trimmed by radar. If the stage thought it was higher than it was, it might not have switched to terminal guidance mode yet. If it had switched, how quickly can it get into 'hover' from the switchover. And finally once in hover how many seconds of fuel does it have to close the final gap?

I thought this was an excellent first shot at landing, and I may be overly optimistic here but it seems like many more things "worked" here than didn't work. That bodes well for the eventual success.

I dont think its the first time. Space explorations like this are always a hit or miss thing. And scientists said that it's even much cheaper to launch another project than attempt to retrieve it.