You are always in the knee of an exp curve. There is no point in the future where the growth breaks down your models. That is a persistent state of the world right now.
Really? Did photos set them under? Almost all FB photos are low resolution compared with the 10MP ones I throw on Flickr and get much less traffic in my estimate.
I believe you, but its amazing that bandwidth costs for photos could set them under for such a long time.
They get more than twice the photo traffic Flickr does. It's also interesting, looking at that second graph and realizing that Facebook hasn't peaked yet. Did you know that according to Compete Facebook is visited nearly as much as Yahoo and Google? Or that it's got 250% the traffic of MySpace?
10 comments
[ 3.6 ms ] story [ 33.9 ms ] threadOhh, and that is why the singularity doesn't exist.
Hm? How does that follow from your first statement?
Didn't Facebook only achieve profitability a month or so ago? Or have I missed something?
http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/09/15/facebook-crosses-300-mi...
Also, were they really making enough money in 2005 for it to be described as 'gazillions'?
I believe you, but its amazing that bandwidth costs for photos could set them under for such a long time.
http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/02/23/facebook-increases-...
They get more than twice the photo traffic Flickr does. It's also interesting, looking at that second graph and realizing that Facebook hasn't peaked yet. Did you know that according to Compete Facebook is visited nearly as much as Yahoo and Google? Or that it's got 250% the traffic of MySpace?