blue+blue tends to win "blue+blue vs olive+olive" rolls.
I uploaded blue vs olive histograms at http://imgur.com/a/p4zK8 -- note, for the comparison ones (labeled with "vs"), -1 means that the leftmost (first) roll won, 0 means a tie, and +1 means that the rightmost (last) roll won.
I'm surprised that the two (very good!) articles ([1] and [2]) I've read did not point that the non-transitive property [3] holds on the dice even though the expectation are transitive:
Of course the expectations have to be transitive; they are scalars.
When you apply a function to pairs (e.g. compare one die against another), you can get non-transitive behavior. This is not earth-shattering, but it is interesting.
Put another way: this is yet another reason to not trust a single summary statistic (e.g. the average in this case) when you really should look at the distribution.
5 comments
[ 4.2 ms ] story [ 20.5 ms ] threadP.S. Blue vs Magenta here: http://imgur.com/a/9e6ne
When you apply a function to pairs (e.g. compare one die against another), you can get non-transitive behavior. This is not earth-shattering, but it is interesting.
Put another way: this is yet another reason to not trust a single summary statistic (e.g. the average in this case) when you really should look at the distribution.
My code is here: https://gist.github.com/xpe/30ae93b107c91ec2ccf5
(Edited at 12:57 PM EST.)
[1] OP: http://latkin.org/blog/2015/01/16/non-transitive-grime-dice-...
[2] http://www.singingbanana.com/dice/article.htm
[3] Actually, there are multiple cycles; the 'secondary' cycles are not as 'strong'.