[–] dandelion_lover 11y ago ↗ Exclusively. [–] idiotclock 11y ago ↗ I get the feeling its being let by the way side. It's harder and harder to switch back to HTML, after using features like calling.It's much faster, no? [–] CatsoCatsoCatso 11y ago ↗ I use it for the speed, despite its lack of features & ugliness. A lot of my devices are getting old chug when loading up new Gmail. Speed is why I use the HTML version. [–] dandelion_lover 11y ago ↗ It's much faster and takes less memory, which is especially improtant for slow laptops. Calling using proprietary online services is no good...
[–] idiotclock 11y ago ↗ I get the feeling its being let by the way side. It's harder and harder to switch back to HTML, after using features like calling.It's much faster, no? [–] CatsoCatsoCatso 11y ago ↗ I use it for the speed, despite its lack of features & ugliness. A lot of my devices are getting old chug when loading up new Gmail. Speed is why I use the HTML version. [–] dandelion_lover 11y ago ↗ It's much faster and takes less memory, which is especially improtant for slow laptops. Calling using proprietary online services is no good...
[–] CatsoCatsoCatso 11y ago ↗ I use it for the speed, despite its lack of features & ugliness. A lot of my devices are getting old chug when loading up new Gmail. Speed is why I use the HTML version.
[–] dandelion_lover 11y ago ↗ It's much faster and takes less memory, which is especially improtant for slow laptops. Calling using proprietary online services is no good...
4 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 17.9 ms ] threadIt's much faster, no?