[–] diminoten 11y ago ↗ No names, then names CNet and calls the leaker a 'she'.The future of journalism, folks. [–] Ronsenshi 11y ago ↗ No names is related to "You can't use my name.". I don't see how mention of CNet is a problem here.I agree with the latter part about gender. Noticed it immediately - that's not how it should be handled. I hope it'll be removed.Then again - that might just be a way to mislead. [–] 20kleagues 11y ago ↗ I agree, stating the gender is the wrong way to go about it. It might be a way to mislead, but someone else could get the axe for this as a result. [–] [deleted] 11y ago ↗ (comment deleted)
[–] Ronsenshi 11y ago ↗ No names is related to "You can't use my name.". I don't see how mention of CNet is a problem here.I agree with the latter part about gender. Noticed it immediately - that's not how it should be handled. I hope it'll be removed.Then again - that might just be a way to mislead. [–] 20kleagues 11y ago ↗ I agree, stating the gender is the wrong way to go about it. It might be a way to mislead, but someone else could get the axe for this as a result. [–] [deleted] 11y ago ↗ (comment deleted)
[–] 20kleagues 11y ago ↗ I agree, stating the gender is the wrong way to go about it. It might be a way to mislead, but someone else could get the axe for this as a result.
5 comments
[ 2.0 ms ] story [ 28.4 ms ] threadThe future of journalism, folks.
I agree with the latter part about gender. Noticed it immediately - that's not how it should be handled. I hope it'll be removed.
Then again - that might just be a way to mislead.