Not a very grabbing blurb. Who's the author, why does his opinion mean anything? Why are there 3 articles? Who are the authors of the other article? In short - why should someone read this that doesn't already agree fully with the conclusions presented?
Shame this isn't getting any traction here. It's pretty interesting and insightful. This is the kind of thing I read and think about PG's "Live in the future" admonition, start to think about a world in which the trajectory of Cost Gravity is traced forward and you will be doing it.
5 comments
[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 19.9 ms ] thread