This may have been in the works for a while. Internally it could have been called Yosemite for years, and marketing probably didn't see a conflict as Yosemite is a pretty consumer name.
It'll be interesting to see the devices that come out of this, sort of a standardized blade server.
I'm still looking for the PoE powered version of this for a small cluster, having a single connection for power and data. Dual NICs would give you ~50W to work with, so it would need something a lot less than the 65W TDP just for the chip. It's also discouraging to see that they tried (and ruled out) the SoCs currently on the market - I'm looking for one of those as well, something that can at least compete with the performance of my 6-year-old desktop processor.
There's plenty of Avoton stuff on the market if that's what you want. I haven't seen motherboards running off POE, but you may be able to use an extractor and then step down to 12V.
25 comments
[ 0.28 ms ] story [ 67.7 ms ] threadThis is great..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yosemite_Sam#Quotes
intel? POWER? arm?
It'd be interesting to find out. Does intel even have a 65w SoC?
http://ark.intel.com/products/family/87041/Intel-Xeon-Proces...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/03/10/facebook_open_comput...
I'm still looking for the PoE powered version of this for a small cluster, having a single connection for power and data. Dual NICs would give you ~50W to work with, so it would need something a lot less than the 65W TDP just for the chip. It's also discouraging to see that they tried (and ruled out) the SoCs currently on the market - I'm looking for one of those as well, something that can at least compete with the performance of my 6-year-old desktop processor.
Edit: Looks like the Xeon D would do it, 45W TDP for the whole SoC - http://www.anandtech.com/show/9070/intel-xeon-d-launched-14n...