Tell HN: My app got someone laid
I have a little Android app (http://phonalyzr.com to see the bar chart) which displays graphs of a user's call history. Today I got a 5-star rating from a user who posted:
"I used this to show my GF that her bar chart block towered over my band. It got me laid that minute. Not kidding"
It reminded me of a this classic Jamie Zawinski blog post: http://www.jwz.org/doc/groupware.html
"So I said, narrow the focus. Your "use case" should be, there's a 22 year old college student living in the dorms. How will this software get him laid?"
That was never MY use-case (my use-case being - I wonder if my call lengths follow a gausssian distribution?), but that post made me smile.
46 comments
[ 4.3 ms ] story [ 112 ms ] threadHowever, with 15 some odd phones releasing in the near future, if you're doing mobile development, you have to be putting more focus on Android.
It's also a hard question to answer, because it depends on app popularity, price, complexity of the app, etc. For my next project, I am planning to roll over iPhone and Android nearly simultaneously, so I look forward to answering that question in a blog post, at least in a relative way.
At least that's how it was last year when I 'used' to do iPhone dev..
Apple only gives you access to the address book, very annoying.
Would love to get more access, to calendar, calls data etc...
As I'd be perfectly willing to do the minimal work of submitting your app for a small portion of the proceeds.
Dealing with international tax law probably makes this not worth it for a small company, particularly as a side business, but it's a thought...
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=938867
Still happy for the bugger!
I think it's more a philosophy of "You get what you give", in more ways than one.
Just wanted to take this chance to say thanks for Phonalyzr. I'm a big fan!
Cool story though, glad to hear your users are finding original uses for your app
"How many feminists does it take to screw in a lightbulb?" "That's not funny." is funny, because it's true.
Guys really want to sleep with girls, and have less options and a harder time of it, especially when they're younger. Guys spend hundreds, thousands of dollars to try to get girls, and almost everything is marketed to men as the answer towards getting women.
Making that explicit acknowledges how things are and what's really actually happening in the world, and is probably less sexist than the average car commercial, beer commercial, diamond commercial, men's magazine, or women's magazine.
> ...and it certainly doesn't acknowledge that there are reasons why things being that way is an undesirable condition.
Okay, think about this for a second: Women can go to basically any party with decent people, whenever they want, with no money and no transportation, without knowing anyone very well, and be fully confident that they can get home safe later. Men? Not so much. For a lot of reasons, women are more sought after and desirable than men, especially from ages 16-24 or so. They have more options and dating and sex is easier for them.
Yet, guys tremendously want women, so they work really hard to try to get women. Now, I believe that men should spend their time primarily working on developing their character and becoming more outstanding instead of chasing a particular girl and being less outstanding. But I digress, the way things are is that women's dating/sexual market value is orders of magnitude higher than a man's, especially when they're both younger. Acknowledging that explicitly - "Your goal should be to get your users hooking up and connecting with people" - is much more honest than the vast majority of marketing and commercials where a guy cracks a beer and then there's the bikini team dancing all around him. "Get your users laid" is a slightly crass and amusing way for saying "facilitate communication between genders to make dating, sex, romance, and courtship more rewarding and less awkward", and that's not a bad thing.
Using somewhat crass terminology - "get laid" - isn't so much sexist as just being a little crass and casual, but gets the message across a lot easier than some politically correct, "Your app should facilitate interpersonal communication and interaction, especially between people open to an intimate relationship" - which means the same thing, but doesn't call it like it really is.
You're leaving out the possibility of rape (date or otherwise). And I'm not sure what you're implying here about men. Men can't be confident that they will get home safe when they go to a party where they don't know anyone?
The only thing that I can guess at here is that you think that a man that goes to a party where he doesn't know anyone will get beat up. If that's the case, how is it more or less likely that a man will get beat up at a party full of strangers than a woman will get raped? If anything I think it would be more likely for a woman to get raped (gets drunk and passes out; guy goes too far while making out and she has a 'victim mindset' so she doesn't protest loud enough for others to hear/notice; etc)
That's very much not the case. How the hell do women judge whether the people at any given party are "decent" without knowing anyone very well? Given the very real risks and dangers women face in these situations (mainly rape), they can't really know. It's one of the more serious problems that women face.
I'm not saying you have a bad overall point here, but this particular example is way off base.
So... a site that allows people to search for other people that want to have sex is a criminal organization? How does facilitating sex between two consenting parties deserve low respect?
If 'Girl A' wants to have sex tonight and 'Boy B' wants to have sex tonight too, what exactly is the problem with finding a way for them to find each other so that they can both have sex tonight?
I'm really not seeing the outrage here. Feminism was (supposed to be) all about empowering women. Doesn't allowing a woman to actively search out sexual partners on her own terms empowerment?
I mean if you really want to misinterpret his post to the extreme you could say that he's advocating becoming a pimp because it "gets people laid," but I doubt that you'll find many other people willing share in that interpretation with you.
Like the old song said "Sex is natural. Sex is good. Not everybody does it, but everybody should". :-)
But to go from that argument to insta-lay, he probably also needed to pull some puppy dog eyes, and maybe reminder her of the flowers he bought that day for no particular reason?
She makes more calls that the BF does? She is more popular than his (music) band? Something else?
My thought when I got the first comment of this kind was "jwz would be so proud".