8 comments

[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 27.1 ms ] thread
I acknowledge the potential health concerns of STD's (not really a legitimate concern... see below) - but it's 2015 and we're still telling two consenting adults what they can and can't do with their bodies?

If health issue and reducing STD's was the primary concern, making prostitution illegal could have adverse affects. People like sex. Those sorts of people will sleep around at bars and clubs. For sex. Being promiscuous and sleeping around is more likely to spread STD's than a regulated sex market (EG: requiring licenses and STD checks of the workers). Without hard statistics and data backing up either side of the argument though... it's a tough call.

Also the gray-area loopholes like escorts - many of whom are hired for their sexual favours.

We waste a lot of time and resources on something that should be inconsequential - barring forced prostitution (which would be illegal under other terms).

I just don't get it.

It's 2015 and we're telling adults what they can and can't do things with their own bodies, individually, why would two adults be any different?

Yes I'm talking about drugs. No, I'm not talking about cartels and violence. It's 2015, and in most jurisdictions it's still illegal for me to grow a plant, on my own property, and then smoke said plant because I find it enjoyable.

This seems like it's going after the sex workers themselves, instead of the real criminals like the pimps and johns.
The women that sell services are the true criminals. Everyone else is innovating and disrupting.
I am looking forward to the day when we outsource prosecution to a for-profit entity so that we can plea bargain against IBM Watson.

Watsecutor: I am charging you with 12 crimes. Using a probabilistic model of the judge and the locality there is a 87% chance that at least 2 of those will stick with a combined minimum sentence of 4.5 years. Based on your public profile, our parallel construction bot will add 4.3 new crimes to your case. Automated Justice Corp recommends taking the installment plan for $410k as prison costs will be need be repaid at $175/day. Freedom is yours for only 75 dollars a day. Thank you for using Automated Justice.

This is the new velvet fascism.

> What this means is that there's a good chance that if you've placed an ad online in the last two years for escorting, massage, BDSM, stripping, private modeling, nude housekeeping, selling your underwear, or any other permutation of the various sexual services people can put on offer, Rescue Forensics has a copy. And because Rescue Forensics has a copy, so do their users in law enforcement.

One could and probably will argue that RF is making a tool and that the moral responsibility to use that tool rests with law enforcement. That is a cop out, we all have to take ownership of the technologies we create or enable. We enable the noble as well at the nefarious with each new technological advance. To create a project, aimed at generating revenue via US law enforcement is at this point in history is morally reprehensible.

As the War on Drugs shrinks, revenue will have to be generated elsewhere.