What you'd build if you had 100 millions?
Imagine that you were approached by a kind person who offered you 100 million dollars to build something of your choice.
This person is very powerful and you cannot possibly cheat, but you don't have to make a profit off your product either.
So, you can take 100 millions and spend your time building something you want. What it would be?
63 comments
[ 7.3 ms ] story [ 137 ms ] threadIf I had to build something technical, I'd build a secure realtime BSD kernel.
And the distance learning department would not use Blackboard, we'd open source our own platform.
Makes me think the people most able to teach these principles would rely on them to avoid your contest.
I would use the 100 million to investigate possible ways of mitigating the effects of such a crash. As the actual causes would be essentially unpredictable I'd pass on that effort and concentrate on what we could do to establish a degree of continuity of core areas of knowledge: maths, medicine, geography etc.
One option would be to build bunkers full of useful books in remote locations (like the gene bank in the Svalbard). However, a better way might be to build a long lasting organisation set apart from our culture - very much like secular versions of medieval monasteries or the mathic concents in Neal Stephenson’s excellent Anathem.
I don't know why threats.org is down at the moment; perhaps it's due to the fact that there weren't that many people willing to actually help with the non-profit a few months ago.
http://continuations.com/post/106672598/looking-for-help-in-...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundation_series
"This person is very powerful and you cannot possibly cheat"
When the project is big, cheating become easier
"but you don't have to make a profit off your product either"
What's the benefit of your work then?
Such support should include money (well, students need food, books, other equipment depending on the course), but I think it should also include support with various buerocratic problems, like facing the german bafoeg-institute and other buerocrats.
Certainly, it will be hard to actually get a good selection principle going and it also needs a plan to get the money back, but once this is done, I think this is a very valuable thing to invest in. I mean, studying is pretty much a full time job (well, if you study hard to get through the universiy fast, it is), and thus, students usually don't have that much time to work and sometimes they even get to pay for being at the university.
Besides that, I would invest a large sum into neurodermatism research, just for pure egoism. I have this problem, and whoever also has this problem knows how bad this status can be whenever it goes active. (To everyone else: Just imagine the urge to scratch your inner elbow, hand or other inappropiate locations until every skin is gone and just a bloody mess is left. After that, one is depressed, cannot move properly and is in pain.) Thus, this would be a second major investment. I guess it also would not be that egoistic, as a lot of people could benefit from results from this research :)
The UN projects that arable land will decline to 1/3 acre per person by 2050 (down from 1 acre/person in 1970). I'd buy up a few old mill buildings (they're all over New England, where I live), and convert them to combination indoor farms using hydroponic or aeroponic growing systems, living space (for farmers), and retail space (to sell the food to the community and offer sales space to other local farmers).
I'd use the roof for combination solar, additional green space, and rain catchment.
Me and a friend have a half-baked (in more ways than one) idea that it would be fun to move to Detroit and get into aquaculture. It's something we managed to romanticize. Give it some steam-punk marketing aesthetic for giggles.
(I think half the value of HN is being able to browse your old comments to remember where you saw something very interesting.)
Alternatively I'll donate the money to someone who can actually use it to make something great.
Primary goal, to provide transparent and neutral public information to voters to enable them to make an actual choice when voting instead of lock stepping according to the current PR spin of any specific party. Secondary goal would be to complement local efforts to increase voting awareness.
Public servants should be under the same metric driven scrutiny by their employers as any other employee for any private company.
(You could argue that, given luck, a lot of people receive $100 million without really "earning" it. That may be the case, but that would probably make me uncomfortable also. However, as in the previous case, I'd still delude myself into thinking I earned it by foresight, brilliant investment, or mettle.)