how about considering it as a special case
of integer linear programming for which
there is an enormous literature of
powerful techniques all of which are just
applied math and can be coded up in
Fortran, ..., C, etc. with no mention at
all of functional programming or monads?
Moreover there are several highly polished
software packages that implement the
applied math.
For a detailed formulation as integer
linear programming there is:
Find
d, e, m, n, o, r, s, y
to solve
maximize z = d + e + m + n + o + r + s + y
subject to
1000 * s + 100 * e + 10 * n + d + 1000 * m
+ 100 * o + 10 * r + e - 10000 * m - 1000 *
o - 100 * n - 10 * e - y <= 0
d, e, m, n, o, r, s, y <= 9
d, e, m, n, o, r, s, y >= 0
and
d, e, m, n, o, r, s, y
integers.
More generally, that constraint
satisfaction is often just looking for a
feasible solution to a linear or linear
integer program is part of why ILOG and
SAP used the R. Bixby optimization
software C-PLEX.
Similarly if functional programming and
monads can make good progress on linear
and/or linear integer programming, then
there are some people in parts of the
applied math, operations research, and
engineering communities that would be very
interested.
And, of course, since integer linear
programming is in NP-complete, really good
work would win a Clay Math prize of $1
million.
can get linear and linear integer
programming on-line.
Then for the sample problem, in the format
of that on-line solver asking for just
linear programming and not integer linear
programming, the problem formulation is
maximize p = d + e + m + n + o + r + s + y
subject to
1000 s + 100 e + 10 n + 1 d + 1000 m
+ 100 o + 10 r + 1 e - 10000 m - 1000
o - 100 n - 10 e - 1 y <= 0,
d + e + m + n + o + r + s + y >= 1,
d <= 9,
e <= 9,
m <= 9,
n <= 9,
o <= 9,
r <= 9,
s <= 9,
y <= 9
Note: In the above, the on-line solver
wants the first constraint to be all on
one line.
Then from the on-line solver an optimal
soluion is:
p = 18;
d = 9, e = 0, m = 0, n = 0, o = 0, r = 0,
s = 0, y = 9
in which case this solution to the sample
problem becomes just
Sorry I didn't see a statement
of the other conditions.
Actually, from what I saw,
just setting all the variables
to 0 would have been a feasible
solution. At least I got
a solution with some of the
variables not 0.
5 comments
[ 4.7 ms ] story [ 20.5 ms ] threadMoreover there are several highly polished software packages that implement the applied math.
For a detailed formulation as integer linear programming there is:
More generally, that constraint satisfaction is often just looking for a feasible solution to a linear or linear integer program is part of why ILOG and SAP used the R. Bixby optimization software C-PLEX.Similarly if functional programming and monads can make good progress on linear and/or linear integer programming, then there are some people in parts of the applied math, operations research, and engineering communities that would be very interested.
And, of course, since integer linear programming is in NP-complete, really good work would win a Clay Math prize of $1 million.
In more detail, at
http://www.zweigmedia.com/RealWorld/simplex.html
can get linear and linear integer programming on-line.
Then for the sample problem, in the format of that on-line solver asking for just linear programming and not integer linear programming, the problem formulation is
Note: In the above, the on-line solver wants the first constraint to be all on one line.Then from the on-line solver an optimal soluion is:
p = 18;
d = 9, e = 0, m = 0, n = 0, o = 0, r = 0, s = 0, y = 9
in which case this solution to the sample problem becomes just
Actually, from what I saw, just setting all the variables to 0 would have been a feasible solution. At least I got a solution with some of the variables not 0.