Ask HN: Am I missing out by not being in sillicon valley?
I'm a serial bootstrapper/software engineer that has been consulting remotely for clients in between trying to start different lifestyle businesses.
I'm living in a small town away from any tech hubs, I feel like I have access to the best of whats happening in tech via the web but sometimes feel like my career is being hurt by not being in sillicon valley.
The lifestyle is laid back here, and things are cheap. I'm not in any kind of rat race. But am I just staying in my comfort zone and missing out?
I would be very interested to hear thoughts of devs who have lived in sillicon valley and whether or not they find it worth the high rents.
172 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 218 ms ] threadSan Diego is even better.
Well. That would make them these little things you can fit thumb and forefinger around that come off a grill. They are but sad, pale, imitations of the true glory that is a Mission burrito. A burrito as done by someone who believes it just a slightly upsized taco.
Burritos over processes and tools
Burritos over comprehensive documentation
Burritos over contract negotiation
Burritos over following a plan
That is, while there is value in the items on the right, we value burritos.
Hopefully you are right and Minneapolis is better. But for my money Phoenix has some great burritos (I don't live there, I'm in Boise)
Crispy tripe tacos at the carniciera near Cook Country jail are better than any Mexican food in San Francisco.
If you fly into Toronto City airport you can walk to Chinatown...
I work in the eye of Silicon Valley and sometimes I wonder if I might be happier with more distance between me and the madness. They pay well to keep me here but it's just human nature to wonder what's on the other side of the fence, I think.
There are a lot of compelling reasons to be in Silicon Valley, but there are (IMO) many more for staying away. You've hit on most of them: the laid back lifestyle and the cost of living being the big ones.
There are a lot of companies that want you to be in Silicon Valley to work for them, but there are quite a few who embrace remote employees (Etsy and 37Signals come to mind). Does it limit your job options? Probably somewhat. Can you still do really interesting work but live in a place that isn't insanely expensive? Absolutely.
If you're happy where you are, stay there and find companies that embrace that. They're likely to be better companies to work for anyway.
In the time I worked remotely, I couldn't help but get the feeling that it also limited your career mobility options as well. Google hangouts or Skype sessions are nice in theory, but when you're in one with a bunch of people across the country who are in the same room together, you miss the subtle quick back and forths with things like body language, as well as the more important ones like actually being able to speak as much as the people actually in the room together (or at all).
Ultimately it's up to you to slam dunk your business.
I moved out of Toronto a year ago to a city (Hamilton) about an hour away where houses were affordable and the city was seeing renewal. My mortgage is much cheaper than a 2 bedroom rental in Toronto and I feel because I have such low overhead, it makes me a much better entrepreneur. I'm willing to take many more risks because I can make my mortgage pretty easily.
So - my quality of life is very high outside a major tech hub and because we work on the internet, I'm still very involved.
I recommend you watch this video about Chris Coyier / CSS Tricks. He runs one of the biggest web development websites around, two podcasts and CodePen from Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRmbVOI6oIM
I've been told by many friends in the Bay Area that day-to-day, it doesn't feel to them like there's enormous networking because everyone is in their own routines. They advised me that a huge percentage of networking can be accomplished by telling people you're "visiting for two weeks".
However, living there long-term and having your personal network double as your professional network is a different order of magnitude benefits. My perception is, from the outside and from visiting, the reason specific companies get bought or partnered with is often because they were more closely socially connected and geographically nearby (more likely to hear about one another, have friends in common, etc.)
I believe it's not something that happens overnight, but over time as an investment in the community and being there long-term.
I've recently made a conscious decision to put other priorities in life (where I really want to live, and my life outside tech) on equal or greater footing. For those for whom that's no conflict, I'm sure it's fantastic to live there.
So, knowing nothing about you, I'd generically say that, yes, a few years in a tech hub can be a lifelong benefit.
If your goal is primarily to save money so that you can retire or don't have to work or can choose when/where/how to work, you're already on the right path. Economically, demand for housing in the bay area is strong enough right now that rents are rising to whatever level people can afford to pay. That means you're basically assured of having little or no surplus unless one of your ventures is wildly successful.
If your goal is to develop a bigger network of people in your industry, you're probably missing out, although your client network will be very valuable to you as well. Also, not all of the people you're missing out on are people you want in your network anyway...
The culture in "silicon valley" is toxic. People are obnoxious and narcissistic; many are pathological liars and self-promoters. Plenty has been written about this, both serious and satirical. There are certainly people who enjoy it, but it sounds like you're fairly happy where you are, so you probably aren't one of them.
If you're tired of bootstrapping and want to get funded, you'll probably have a better chance in the bay area or some other large city. Otherwise this is moot for you.
Also, remember that most of "silicon valley" isn't involved in technology any more. It's become mostly a media/advertising center. There are still technology companies around, but the focus has definitely shifted.
You might want to ask yourself not "am I missing out?" but rather "what would I like to change about my present circumstances?" and go from there.
Can you please elaborate?
There are many, many other examples. If you look at a random sampling of promotional posts to HN, you will see a cross-section of the entire global economy: retailers (lots of 'em), restaurants, media, manufacturing, and yes, technology. It's fair to say that a lot of people in the bay area are interested in technology, but most of their employers are properly placed in other sectors based on their business models, revenue sources, and other objective metrics. The development of new technology for sale as a business model has been in decline for a long time and is far from dominant in the bay area today.
Note that this is not necessarily good or bad. It just is, and reflects a transition among a group of people from developing new technologies to exploiting that technology in more traditional business models.
Usually when people talk of the bygone era when Silicon Valley was actually about technology, they're referring to one of two things:
1.) A particular sort of nostalgic history whitewashing where we forget that the money for all of these fundamental innovations largely came from DARPA contracts to find new, more efficient ways to vaporize Russians.
2.) The PC revolution of the 1970s, which started at Intel and PARC and then spread through Homebrew, Apple, and numerous other startups.
Both of these apply the benefit of hindsight to what was actually going on at the time. There's plenty of the old Homebrew culture still going on in Silicon Valley - all you have to do is go to Maker Faire to see it. It's just that right now, at this moment, without the benefit of hindsight, it just looks like a bunch of geeks tinkering with toys.
http://www.smecc.org/hewlett-packard_the_start__-2.htm
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/264529/Hewlett-Pac...
In the 70s and 80s, Silicon Valley was primarily interested in making new hardware and software to put inside metal boxes, then selling the box and its contents as the solution to some problem the buyer has (or not). Today, the bay area's "tech" companies are primarily interested in writing or customizing software to solve some set of their own problems with whatever business they're really in. Those are very different ways of making money. Neither is wrong, but I submit that only the former makes you a "technology company". Otherwise every company is a technology company and the term means nothing.
I'd also disagree on your characterization of how Google/Facebook apply technology, but figured I'd meet your argument where it was instead of where it should be. Having worked for the non-revenue-generating side of Google (which, by employee count, is roughly 2/3 of it), we cared a lot about solving the user's problems, where "users" = people who search, not people who paid us. Google is in a multi-sided market: it's a business that has identified multiple different groups of people, such that all of them gain something from the product and some of them will pay money for it. Larry understands very well that the market collapses if any one of those groups (users, content creators, advertisers) stops using the product, and organizationally Google is (was?) setup with an executive solely responsible to each of those groups who is explicitly told to ignore the interests of the others.
There are still hardware startups whose business model is selling a physical "thing" that embodies technology and lets you do things. By and large, though, that segment of the economy is shrinking, as younger buyers increasingly don't want to own "things" and do want to own "experiences". Companies slim down in response to offer the experience their customers desire while retaining ownership of the things that make that possible.
What's objectionable about today's Silicon Valley isn't that it's not about silicon (or even software or any kind of new technology at all) but that it continues, collectively and individually, to market itself as though it were. There's nothing wrong with making phone books. Phone books are useful. Google makes a pretty nice one, and sometimes the Yellow Pages (the ads) are exactly what you want anyway. But you're not selling technology, you're selling ads in phone books that you then give away. Just say so.
While we're here, don't deceive yourself into thinking that assembling the contents of the phone book in a complete, concise, useful way (what "users" want) isn't revenue-generating. The more useful the phone book is, the more advertisers will pay to appear in it. If you end up creating some whiz-bang technology for internal use that makes that easier/better/whatever, that's great. But if you're not bringing that to market for others to use, you shouldn't be calling yourself a technology company.
Today, the dominant business model is "let's find a way to get a lot of people's attention and then sell the right to show them propaganda."
Obviously these models are not even approximately equivalent and will attract/create very different ecosystems.
There are, in fact, a lot more companies now that do what Hewlett and Packard were doing then.
One can't reasonably expect that set of companies would grow to infinite size, because the economy can only support so many of these types of businesses.
So if we want to define only the former business model as a technology company, the end result would probably be "we've hit the limit of supportable technology companies, there will be no more technology companies until that changes". Because of this, it doesn't really make sense to define it that way[1].
It turns out the economy seems to support more of this other kind of business, so it has become dominant. That too is the natural order of things.
Otherwise, this is like OP complaining "man, there aren't a lot of paper mills anymore", when the economy doesn't support paper mills being around anymore.
[1] Though it is, of course, reasonable to have liked it better back in those days if you did.
I grew in Silicon Valley and work here now as a dev at one of the major tech companies and have no idea what you're talking about. The people I work with seem totally normal.
Well I mean, they're all relatively enthusiastic about technology, and generally affluent, but aside from that I don't see anything particularly unusual.
It could be that it's just what your used to. People that grew up outside of the area may see things a little differently based on their life experiences in other places.
I worked as a dev at one of the major tech companies here for 5 years and basically found that all my coworkers were nice, normal, fairly geeky engineers who really loved technology. My fiancee grew up in the area, doesn't work at tech, and most of her friends are locals. They're all very normal and friendly too. (Probably moreso than I'm used to - I grew up in New England, where everybody's reserved until you get to know them.)
The problem is that the folks who are grandiose self-promoters seem to spend all their time self-promoting, which makes you disproportionately likely to run into them, particularly if you go to startup events. Stay away from that corner and Silicon Valley is basically just a bunch of highly-educated nerds who work very hard.
I spent a few years living in SF. I think the geek monoculture kind of drove me away. I accidentally fell into tech via math and felt like there was this pressure to conform to this image of a "nerdy engineer". No, I don't obsess about board games or comic books or the latest Japanese cartoons. I kind of get why someone likes them but it gets overwhelming.
Another thing that got annoying was how everyone kept going on and on about tech everywhere. Again, maybe things are different in the South Bay, but SF felt like a flurry of Coffee shops filled with folks talking about Ruby, Haskell and Data Science.
I still remember sitting in a Coffee Shop after I interviewed at my current company in NYC. I overheard a brief conversation between two girls about Python. The fact that they meant the reptile and not the language kind of sealed the deal for me.
Now, if you're a founder, you'll see many other founders and VCs whose actions align with those characteristics.
>The people I work with seem totally normal.
These two statements don't seem related to you?
I grew up in Orlando, Florida and for the first 25 years of my life, I thought people just went to Disney World when they felt like it. I thought everyone was tan and wore sunglasses and shorts all the time. I thought everyone knew how to surf, or had been to the ocean recently. I thought most people just had guns and didn't worry about them.
All of these things were normal to me, because I hadn't experienced other people's normal. So when you say "I grew up here, all of the people I know are normal," you're basically saying "I live in a filter bubble and might be accidentally proving your point."
Several months ago I went to the south bay for a job interview. The people who interviewed me seemed nice, if not cut throat. However, I was rather shocked by some of the people I met at the hotel. They were very smug and had extremely entitled attitudes. A few of them were very happy to share with me the fact that they own multiple homes, although I didn't ask them. One guy straight up told me he doesn't like blacks and hispanics. This comment was made at the hotel rooftop pool. It was not a private conversation and the man didn't seem to even fathom that I might have found that offensive.
Then again, it was a ritzy hotel in the most expensive part of that town. I might meet similar people if I stayed at the St. Regis in NYC for a few days.
So IDK, are Silicon Valley types ass trumpets?
I work in NYC too, after spending quite a few years in the bay area. Tech has a diversity problem in general. It is not like things are magically all sunshine and rainbows in NY.
The only distinction is that the Bay has so many many of these small companies that are filled with white men in their twenties who all went to school together and think alike.
Yeah, a lot of them can be as bro-like as your typical finance bro.
There is a big difference between "east side san jose" or sunnyvale or something.
And yeah I agree, San Jose is a lot more chill... but IMO that's because there's less of the Silicon Valley there, if that makes sense.
Oh... and for the record, I just agree with the narcissistic part... I have no idea what OP is talking about with regards to being obnoxious, pathological liars, self-promoters, etc.
The culture of the bay area in general can be very toxic for a particular type of individual. If you're religious or lean to the right in any way, you'll be met with open hostility. The culture of the bay area is also passive aggressive. Nobody wants to offend or confront, so if your manager doesn't like you, you probably won't know it. You'll just get the shittiest tasks and won't be sure why. It's a particular kind of hell for someone who values honestly and blunt talk, like a new yorker, for example.
That's a pretty common practice in a lot of companies everywhere - it's called "managing someone out" (as in "out the door"). Companies do it because if an employee can be convinced to leave voluntarily, the company saves money and avoids the potential lawsuit that might ensue from a termination.
This should be read as YMMV (your mileage may vary). One person in Silicon Valley and his anecdotal evidence based on interactions w/ a few bad apples does not represent every single person in Silicon Valley.
For example, I find all the characters on HBO's Entourage to be insufferable and self-obsessed douchebags, but to some of the people I've talk to in the film business, they seem to love those characters and deeply relate with them.
This hasn't been my experience at all.
There are obnoxious and narcissistic people everywhere. I've been living here for many years after having grown up and lived in many different places all over the world. I feel like I'm usually surrounded by usually nice and helpful people here.
Those statements by you sounds like an overly cynical's person's view of a place they've somehow come to hate and are probably perceiving that reflected back at them from the people you're surrounded with. Please please don't project your own problems on the whole society around you.
Striking a balance -- it's also good to attend workshops, meet-ups, and conferences in other markets.
SV has more opportunities for engineers/entrepreneurs, but then you're up against people who have done a lot more of that, plus the outrageous housing costs in the area. Oh, and the crazy traffic.
I was living in a 'burb and moved back to the city for quality of life. Being able to walk to things (grocery store, restaurants, bars) was more important to me than having a bunch of land. Also, my commute is now 5-10 minutes instead of 30-90. The cost of it was a smaller house on a much smaller plot of land, but we decided that's a sacrifice we're willing to make.
I will say that the weather is nice in much of the bay, SF has (I think) one of the highest young single populations in the world which can make for an interesting time, and there are many events that take place that could help your business but a plane ticket can rectify that.
Besides the networking you just feel pressure (and inspiration?) to work faster and harder. Not just because your savings are being eaten alive, but also because many are majorly ambitious.
On a list of top five things that will make or break your company, I don't think Silicon Valley would make the list. But if you live and breathe your startup and want nothing else in the world, it's worth a look.
Unless you're one of the very few that work trumps all. Other factors can be more important. I still live in my hometown (Sacramento) because family is here.
Personally San Diego is more tempting than the Bay. An uncle moved for school and never left...
I will also note, as a resident of the USA familiar with the common calendar, that there are ten other months to the year.
It depends on what you want. If you can travel, if you can get out to 3-5 conferences per year, and if you get out to Meetups (or organize a few) in the nearest major city, then you're probably learning just as much as you would if you were in the Valley. You might be learning more, because you're more relaxed.
That said, if you want to work for one of the giant tech companies, the main office usually gets the most interesting projects. If you decide to work for Google, try to get them to relocate you to Mountain View. The imperial culture is strong in Bay Area tech giants and in venture capital.
In general, though, the Valley sucks (unless you're trying to raise money). Under 30, you suffer a bad dating scene if you're a heterosexual male (and I've heard that it's unpleasant more generally). After 30, you're too old for the nonsense and, if you're thinking about having a family, forget it. San Francisco is half-decent and has a lot of natural beauty, but it's dysfunctional and shockingly expensive (worse than New York, and you get a lot less!) There are a lot of great jobs in the Valley that I'd say you should take if you're a typical person, but you'd take them in spite of their location, not because of it.
In NYC I lived in Brooklyn and took the subway to work and was pretty happy with that. In silicon valley this is usually not an option. There are company shuttles, but it is not the same as just jumping on the next city bound train.
You will need a car, and you will want to live in expensive areas to avoid horrible commutes. This is also true for SF, the transportation system even there is nothing like NYC, even including NJ.
On a personal level, I find SF/Bay area much more boring than NYC. The food options are nowhere near as good either. I'm happy with that as I'm getting older with a nice house and family. But if I was 25 I would stay in NYC, there are more than enough tech jobs there and you can live for cheaper if you want.
I really liked Brooklyn, there is a lot going on there.
The housing crisis and (to a much lesser extent) generally high wages amplify this imbalance.
Lots of people say that Silicon Valley pays particularly well, and I think this is true only statistically. Silicon Valley pays world-class engineers more than Chicago pays mediocre engineers. I believe a world-class engineer is likely to make more in Chicago than in Silicon Valley, provided that the engineer can find a suitable job at all in Chicago.
So if want to maximize expected income, I think you should live in NYC working in finance, or if you don't like that option, anywhere in the U.S. except the Bay Area. I don't know anything about the rest of the world so I wouldn't give any advice about that.
If you want to maximize the likelihood that you can find an interesting job in software, you should move to the Bay Area.
It is likely that while you won't grow a billion-dollar social media site that way that you can find yourself an underserved niche, or a niche dominated by somebody still peddling software from the 80s, or something like that. This turns the "problem" of not being in SV into a foundation of your career, which, if that is what you are looking for, can be a good deal.
That said, I don't think I would live in Silicon Valley proper, rather SF where you can actually run into other human beings, which is the point. And actually I personally wouldn't live in SF either due to the lack of any meaningful cultural industries (art, music, etc.)
You work remotely right? Split some time here. about 3 months here will let you know for certain if you are or not.
There are alot of hostels and hacker houses (just google "hacker house sf" or "hacker house silicon valley")
Also remember its really interesting how the layout of companies in the valley follows the OSI model
https://engineering.linkedin.com/endorsements/geographic-tre...
So make sure to spend time not only in San Francisco but also in Palo alto, Mountain View, and maybe even San Jose.
That way you can experience the whole of whats out here and decide for yourself.
Myself personally I found out I very much was. The level of talent and the caliber of the average person in tech here is rarely paralleled.
Not to mention most other markets don't create the caliber of consumer tech compaines I'm most passionate about and are more focused on B2B.
I learn alot through osmosis so I would be short changing myself to be anywhere else if I want to be among the best in the field.
There are certainly snakes and sociopaths around but any place there is money to be made or power to be had you will find those people.
SF and SV do the best job they can to still only reward those with the talent to make big things happen.
I'll check them out right after graduation.