Ask HN: More reliable than shared webhosting, more friendly than a VPS?
I have several past projects and clients on shared web hosts. Basically, a single server, running apache configured to run hundreds of virtual domains.
I've been monitoring these sites and there are frequent service hiccups. At least once a day there is a slow/response time (>8secs), no response, high load (>20), etc. This isn't a problem with one provider, it's simply what happens when one of the sites on the same server is hacked or gets high load, or a script gets stuck in a loop, etc.
I use a VPS for my own projects, and it is clearly superior in term of performance. I'm wondering if there are hosting providers that offer virtual servers solely for web hosting? Basically, a simple setup, a bit less expensive and maybe a cPanel-style control panel. Anything out there like this?
8 comments
[ 26.3 ms ] story [ 777 ms ] threadWe only use VPSs with dedicated hardware assigned to it, so no shared memory, or shared cpu. Other customers can't cause delays on your service.
"Cloud Servers" = 256MB for ~$10/month which is a great price - but it looks like a plain old VPS. I could set it up, but there's no "friendly" way to administer it.
"Managed Servers" are starting at $100/month, which is way too expensive.
Cloud Sites (which is $100/month) is a clustered, high availability hosting platform. I haven't personally used it, but based on my great experience with Cloud Servers, I'd expect it to be worth every penny.
Still looking for something as simple as a shared webhosting (mail and webserver work "out of the box", easy control panel) but with better performance.
There's a business idea here for someone.