7 comments

[ 3.5 ms ] story [ 64.9 ms ] thread
No animals were harmed in the making of this report.
Which is a report on the report in which animals were harmed. Let us remember them as martyrs to science and the knowledge required to preserve many more intelligent lives in the future.
How is harmful treatment of animals required to preserve intelligent lives?
Today, maybe not so much. However as we become a space-fairing species knowing the limits to which things must be designed (examples, blast shutters in films/anime and self-sealing blobs from scifi/anime) will help. Knowing the causes of death might also enable a better focus for pre/post treatment and medical research/supply staging.
For something supposedly from 1965 it looks a lot like a LaTex document. Was layout that good back in 65?
Have you seen a book or magazine from before computers? LaTeX replicates what professional typesetters did.
BTW I was interested in Googling for this after reading this New Yorker essay on the costs of colonizing Mars:

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/06/01/project-exodus-...

> The pressure differential also had unhappy gastric consequences. The ballooning dogs expelled air from their bowels; this led frequently—and simultaneously—to defecation, urination, and projectile vomiting. The animals suffered what looked like grand-mal seizures, and their tongues froze. (This last effect was a result of heat loss through rapid evaporation.) All told, a hundred and twenty-six dogs were tested in the chamber, for varying lengths of time. Of those which spent two minutes in simulated space, a third died. The rest deflated and, eventually, recovered. Among those which remained in a vacuum for three minutes, the mortality figure climbed to two-thirds.

I came across “Experimental Animal Decompressions to a Near-Vacuum Environment” while reading up on the One-Year Mission. Maybe it’s just a sign of my geocentric bias, but I was struck by the correspondences. For all his training and his courage, Kelly is basically just another test mammal. Like the dogs, he’s been sealed in an airtight chamber to see how much his body can take. And in both experiments the results, at least in their broad outline, are totally predictable.

HN discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9601697