If you're talking solely about its looks and contents, then I won't argue. But if you look at the HTML behind it... it's pretty bad: the internet doesn't need more pages this poorly written. :P
Try and validate it: https://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fericschmidt....
Half as many errors as there are lines of HTML, and that's HTML 4 transitional.
Oh well, it doesn't matter too much, but I'm a web developer so I still have to care to a degree. ;)
Interesting... I may decide to downplay my own page... I've been trying to find a combination of time and motivation to move my blog and homepage into something more cohesive, though I don't think I'd go quite this basic... it looks so much like something from 1994 to be honest.
As to another's comment on the speed... interestingly enough the image and twitter button don't actually load that fast... they pop in.... for what it is, having the images inline may be a better choice (for raw speed). As would simplifying the broken markup.
17 comments
[ 3.5 ms ] story [ 55.8 ms ] threadEDIT: at least I prefer pages like this over say LinkedIn profile.
If you're talking solely about its looks and contents, then I won't argue. But if you look at the HTML behind it... it's pretty bad: the internet doesn't need more pages this poorly written. :P Try and validate it: https://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fericschmidt....
Half as many errors as there are lines of HTML, and that's HTML 4 transitional.
Oh well, it doesn't matter too much, but I'm a web developer so I still have to care to a degree. ;)
This can be confirmed with internet archive. [1] vs [2]
[1] http://web.archive.org/web/20111220220928/http://ericschmidt...
[2] http://web.archive.org/web/20131030012224/http://ericschmidt...
* 2001: A big photo that looks like it was taken during a "Networld+Interop"/Novell presentation
* 2001: eschmidt@novell.com :)
* 2002: eschmidt@google.com
* 2005: ericschmidt1@yahoo.com
* 2014: twitter button
It hasn't changed much since 2001 :)
http://web.archive.org/web/20010422003224/http://ericschmidt...
As to another's comment on the speed... interestingly enough the image and twitter button don't actually load that fast... they pop in.... for what it is, having the images inline may be a better choice (for raw speed). As would simplifying the broken markup.