I would add some customization for employers in the message that you send out with the challenge. I would also set the reply-to / from on the email to match the name and email of the person who is sending it out.
If I were using this for job interviews, one reason I wouldn't use it is because it might scare away potential candidates because the email doesn't appear to be from me.
I want a human to see my code, someone with whom I can walk through and explain my design decisions. Doing a simple exercise and getting it right vs. wrong doesn't help anyone.
If a company asked me to do quizzes like this for them I likely wouldn't apply.
Sorry to be harsh, I think the idea is a good sell to companies looking to stop wasting devtime on candidates who can't solve these simple exercises. I just think further removing the human factor from the interviewing process is an overall step in the wrong direction.
It would be nice if you also provide hints to solve the problems as that might help candidates, and also somewhat would resemble phone screen. You might also want to emphasize more on writing code comments over getting the solution 100% correct. I literally hate platforms like codilty where getting solution 100% correct in the defined time is the main motive, rather than understanding the candidates thought process.
I find a more effective solution to this problem is viewing code/projects the candidate has completed. No developer I know would jump through these hoops.
21 comments
[ 5.5 ms ] story [ 70.3 ms ] threadI would add some customization for employers in the message that you send out with the challenge. I would also set the reply-to / from on the email to match the name and email of the person who is sending it out.
If I were using this for job interviews, one reason I wouldn't use it is because it might scare away potential candidates because the email doesn't appear to be from me.
I want a human to see my code, someone with whom I can walk through and explain my design decisions. Doing a simple exercise and getting it right vs. wrong doesn't help anyone.
If a company asked me to do quizzes like this for them I likely wouldn't apply.
Sorry to be harsh, I think the idea is a good sell to companies looking to stop wasting devtime on candidates who can't solve these simple exercises. I just think further removing the human factor from the interviewing process is an overall step in the wrong direction.
I'm curious because this is what we do and I hadn't considered that we might miss some good people because of it.
You want to explain your solution? Use headphones and skype at the same time. Problem solved
Beats paying $200 out of your own pocket so you can travel to their HQ an write fizzbuzz live for them (yes this happened to me)