HN Explorer

Why not rename PostgreSQL officially (back) to Postgres?

5 points by vfclists ↗ HN
Am I the only one who thinks PostgreSQL is better renamed (back) to its original Postgres? I prefer to pronounce it Postgres-sequel rather than Postgres ESS-QUE-ELL.

Since there isn't a double S in the name, is it Postgre SQL, in which case pronouncing without the SQL makes it Postgre, like a French word, or is there an invisible S, thus making it legal to pronouce it as Postgres ESS-QUE-ELL or Postgres SEQUEL?

Any time I am engaged in a query involving PostgreSQL, I always have a feeling that there is an unspoken agreement that the name is rather awkward, kinda uncool, that it is not quite right.

If the group still has the rights to the name they should simply rename it. A lot of the other database systems don't to feel the need to tack 'SQL' to the name. Oracle doesn't, MariaDB doesnt' DB2 doesn't,so why the need to retain it? Having to tag SQL on to the end makes it seem like the brand name cannot be established on its own without the SQL tag.

It may have been significant years ago given its roots but I think it is not that relevant in contemporary times.

12 comments

[ 1.9 ms ] story [ 50.1 ms ] thread
SixSigma
Does anyone ever say anything other than Postgres?
slashnull
I thought it was meant to be "Postgres-Q-L"

Edit: wow, the naming page says that Postgres-QL is a "weird derivation".

dagw
For what it's worth I've also always pronounced it "Postgres-Q-L".
electroly
I think you misunderstood what that bullet point is trying to say. It IS "Postgres-Q-L". That bullet point is talking about someone theoretically thinking that the name is logically two parts: "Postgres" and "QL". When really it's "Postgres" and "SQL" and the middle S is elided.
slashnull
But it is Postgres - QL, because you have Postgres, the server, and its Query Language. Straightforward.

... okay no I was trolling

cryptos
I agree with you.

1. everybody already calls the DB Postgres, and 2. there are some additions to classic SQL, which makes the "SQL" somewhat curious.

jtchang
Everyone I know understands when I say Postgres. Maybe they should do a survey.
slashnull
Is there a product called, or commonly referred to as "PSQL" that could be confused for PostgresSQL?

Because I think the project should start advocating "PSQL".

See,

The competition is called "MySQL". One syllable, then SQL. You know what it does, and you know how to google it. It googles great, too.

PSQL has the same advantages. Google even already understands it.

nunwuo
The good thing about the current name is that there's a clear distinction (at least to users "in the loop") between "psql", the command-line client, and "postgres" the backend service. I'm quite aggressively against renaming the product to "psql".