8 comments

[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 31.4 ms ] thread
In summary - how does this compare (technology and/or cost) to common container housing, as seen on building sites and refugee centers today?
Is not clear how the unit is powered. Does it have batteries, solar panels or do you have to plug it in?
I'm wondering about this too. That, combined with what looks like a lack of windows, would make this somewhat impractical in emergency housing situations where the restoration of electricity is likely to take a lot longer than setting up shelters.
Good luck getting trucks with this into Nepal. Tents or even wood for cabin can be air droped.
The wrist band lock seems rather impractical the majority of circumstances that you'd encounter in the aftermath of a disaster or in refugee camps. And the advantage of no assembly seems to be a rather small advantage compared to the cost (a rather bulky construction). The amount of shelters you can put on a truck (http://static1.squarespace.com/static/52e6ca70e4b0aeaf06546d...) seems to be quite little.

I like the techy look and the idea seems cool, but it also seems to look like a very technocratic approach to shelters. This might work well for first world countries that have to deal with the fixing shelters after a disaster when conditions are quite good. But I can't see this helping out afters disasters like the one in Nepal.

Yeah imagine how many tents you can fit on a truck that size! 100s maybe a thousand. Let alone can a truck get into the disaster zone?
Roadmap: After 7 years exos capable for space launch? Did I hear that correctly?