Although I loathe both Monsanto's corporate behavior in general and the taste of aspartame specifically (I use stevia), it struck me that many of the statements in this article are ripped straight from the assortment of anti-aspartame hysteria sites (holisticmed, Betty Martini et al)... right down to duplicating the same typos ("one main health effects", "Reagans’", "it’s (sic) safety", and the rather obvious "We have written").
A badly written badly argued hatchet job. (And largely plaigerized too!) Maybe you should have doubts about the safety of aspertame, but this article deserves zero weight in the assessment.
How did this get upvoted? This article is horribly written and full of mostly irrelevant information, presented as if it's an argument against aspartame.
3 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 12.3 ms ] thread