Ask HN: The older you are, the more you want to see non-tech on HN?
I suspect that the older you are, the more interests you have that have accumulated as a result of life experience.
Tech starts to look the same after you have seen so much of it. In fact, I think that the older you are, the less likely you are to browse through technical books in a bookstore/library.
Moreover, you would be more interested in topics such as consciousness partly out of intellectual curiosity and partly out of consideration of your own mortality.
Finally, I suspect that older readers are more tolerant of others expressing various theories that they have about all sorts of things -- even without citations. And this probably has something to do with placing greater value on life experience.
33 comments
[ 4.2 ms ] story [ 102 ms ] threadI do have very broad interests outside of technical topics, but regard as pointless and irrelevant here postings on consciousness, etc.
Including this one.
I've noticed in the past that whenever you try posting on topics outside of technical matters you are repeatedly ignored or flagged. Perhaps an alternative hypothesis is that while these things are of interest in general, they don't really belong here. The evidence seems to be against your hypothesis. Try applying some science and changing it.
A post on consciousness is of interest in theoretical computer science for example:
http://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2009/12/03/is-there-a-test-for...
I have little interest in building a machine or spending effort talking about a machine that acts like a human. I am more interested in building a machine that is a tool that enhances human abilities. For example, we used to keep track of our resources with pen and paper. We have built machines that make that easier. We used to walk to school, now we have cars and busses to drive us there. We used to dream about flying, now it is routine.
The classic AI approach (speaking of Minsky and others there) seems to be aimed at replicating a human.
Conversation about consciousness strike me as ill-informed and are not of any interest to me. But perhaps I am a simple country boy after all.
I'm also less tolerant of those who bring up old ideas as if they were newly discovered except if they happen to have been before their time. However, "stupid ideas" really get me.
I'm 36, and have been on the interwebs long enough to know where to find the other non-tech bits of interest.
I prefer just the facts here.
This is different from the absorption of youth. It may actually get a bit harder to be so fully absorbed. But a bit easier to set aside an intriguing novelty that does not pertain to your current endeavors.
So sometimes there a feeling of "What! That again??" when some topic such as "NoSQL" comes up, but that doesn't, to me, make tech in general less interesting.
At 44, I'm backing up your argument. But honestly, I had already accumulated most of my eclectic intellectual curiosity a quarter century ago. Even so, I still browse the technical books at bookstores. Libraries are hopelessly out-of-date on anything technical that would interest me. I don't need the latest power users' guide to anything. I'm interested in new insights into building something that has never been done before.
Yes, my interests are quite varied and wide, and I have places to go on the net and elsewhere to explore them. I come to hn because i look for the serious technical discussions you find here and the startup and business focus.
I am not interested in topics such as consciousness as I find them particularly undisciplined or worse. And not sure how that is influenced by our consideration of mortality.
I value the HN community as a chance to network with like minded people. I sometimes feel isolated living in a rust belt state where coders and startups aren't understood and barely even tolerated.
More interests with age: true.
Tech starts to look the same: sometimes, but there is more groundbreaking stuff going on than ever before.
Bookstores: yes, but is that because of my interests changing, because the books available are getting more superficial? Would you believe that in the early 1980s, the bookstore at the mall stocked comp sci texts? I bought one volume of Knuth there.
Consciousness: If I'm interested it's because it looks like we're on the verge of being able to program it.
Tolerance of others' theories: only if they're genuinely new.
Life experience: absolutely not. In fact, the one thing I've learned from joining Facebook this year is that most people spend their time doing stuff that would bore me to death.
My age: 50, and gratified to see so many others of my generation speaking up here. (I can't call us old, because we're not.)
I realize the NYT is linked on the main page of the YC main site, but the two posts that seem to show up every day strikes me as being spam in a tech forum. They are not on topic. Same with the climate change conundrum posts, there are other forums that discuss that on a daily basis such as http://www.abovetopsecret.com/ .
If this is a vote type of thing I would vote for tech and industry related business posts only. That is what makes us special and unique as a forum.