Ask HN: How to solve the problems of greece?
Currently my own ideas are very extremistic in one way or another:
a) intervene with military force and set up a temporary government that pushes much needed laws, ensures that taxes are paid without exceptions and fights corruption without mercy. This way the society can be transformed and modernized.
b) All EU states give up their antique national mindsets to form the united states of europe, this way all dept is combined into the EU entity and a new central government can deal with it on large scale effectively. I personally would love this, no matter the circumstances.
c) Increase lendings massively without the austerity politics, so the greece folks can actually start to invest and trigger positive economic signals. But I think this delays just the fundamental problems...
So, what do HNers think about this topic? Is there any viable solution for the current situation?
16 comments
[ 5.3 ms ] story [ 51.9 ms ] threadGreece should leave the EU, and the debt should be forgiven. It should have never joined and will be much better off outside, like Switzerland (a structurally similar economy).
The idea that Greeks have a "culture of tax evasion" is simplistic. A lot of this has to do with the government's cozy relationship with Greek oligarchs. You are less inclined to pay taxes if they are perceived as propping up a corrupt government.
For all its flaws, Syriza doesn't seem to be as corrupt. I also don't see it as the "far-left" ideologically socialist party it's often portrayed as. They seem to be people that will learn fast where and when government should intervene productively.
If we would be the united states of europe this would be a different story, but currently it seems that greece just tries to leech as much money as possible while openly offending us. And by the way, there are poorer states than greece that will pay it's share of the bill in the eu. Am I wrong?
I hope so. This will be a win/win situation for everybody.
This way investors will learn to choose better and look more closely at their money the next time, instead to act like fools for years and them panic and waterboarding entire countries unless they agree to assume their private failures as own and fix with public money their recurrent malpractices.
Sorry by the bitterness but this sound exactly like the big plans for Irak. "The new Greece, now with 40% more of democracy kindly carried for our troops... and only cost US a few extra billions!"
Sometimes the right solution is simply to let fall the speculators. Military intervention just raise a new debt in an endless circle. Nobody can win always, not even banskters.
The fact is the EU currency union was deeply flawed from the beginning, and favors exporting economies like Germany over a tourism/shipping economy like Greece. Greece was the fastest growing economy in Europe for decades prior to joining the Euro, and given its immense advantages, there's little reason to suspect this wouldn't have continued in a fair and equitable union, despite corruption & overspending.
Invading Greece to recoup the losses of large banks is not only insane and unethical, but will undoubtedly be met by the bloody resistance of a proud people. It would probably lead to a third world war, which the EU was created to prevent. Your option B is a better union, but it seems very unlikely to happen.
The best bet is what is going to happen anyway .. Greece will leave the Euro, struggle to get back on its feet, but once it does it will prosper as currency devaluation will play to its strengths as the most enticing per capita tourism mecca in the world.
So yeah, the consequences might be real and hard i'd say
My comments:
a) By force isn't going to happen. The EU integration was about preventing wars by greater integration, especially economics.
b) That is probably where the EU is heading in many, many years to come... but not now.
c) I doubt any of the lenders want to throw anymore good money after bad.
So yeah... what the heck to do?
I really hate to say it but that leaves only two things Greece can do:
1) Greece has to leave the Eurodollar but is still a member of the EU, or
2) Greece leaves the EU completely (including the Eurodollar), and
...only one thing the creditors can do:
1) Extend better repayment terms.
So why would I suggest the above? Well for one thing the reason the UK is doing well economically is because the Bank of England has greater control over fiscal and monetary policy AKA the UK still has the pound (GBP).
My take on things is that Greece won't get out of this mess until they get a handle on fiscal and monetary policy and the main way to do that is by controlling your own national currency.
Also to my knowledge no Government has ever been allowed to go 'Bankrupt'. Essentially fiat currency is backed on the tax intake of a nation... but in the case of the EU... on the tax intake of the entire EU block.
There is some German poster who got down voted on what seems like the basis of a negative stance on Greece's predicament, however by linking all the currencies together the German politicians were tacitly agreeing to back Greece. Therefore IMHO it's not wholly Greece's fault that this mess got this far... the ECB and EU member nations should have tightened things up but then again France, Spain and Portugal are basket cases as well. And don't get me started on the fact that the EU's books aren't even audited... never the less, the point I was making is that it seems like the mood in the EU is to stop supporting Greece financially which means that Greece needs it's own currency again.
And I don't just say this matter the factly... what I'm suggesting will have huge ramifications and destroy lives, families, businesses--it's be total economic chaos until the market can sort itself out again (because by linking the different currencies together the market has been allowed to distort).
Both are being pretty stable right now.
Clearly big guys are not buying this BS and this game is going to get played safe for a while for now not matter what news outlets are wanting crowd to believe.
Non-event for people who know.
In regards to military intervention, I would never support this. Where do you draw the line when a nation invades because we believe we can run the country better, largely in a world where everyone think they are correct in their thinking.