I found your original article interesting, and I'm glad someone wrote about these Safari issues. But I also have to agree that one has to be very cautious when coming up with article titles. You're giving people a misleading context before even reading the content.
Wow, HN commenters are brutal! :) I thought the title captured the spirit of the piece; the problem was that people shared it without discussing the contents. As if to say, "Welp, that's it: Safari is the new IE. After all, some dude said it!"
This has literally no additional content beyond the original except for a little bit of "Wow I didn't expect the big response!" and a lame "It wasn't link bait!" claim. (He had to know it was sensationalist.)
The original article's claim was ludicrous and this doesn't do anything to walk it back at all.
8 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 30.5 ms ] threadyawn
But don't let reality break your own agenda
The original article's claim was ludicrous and this doesn't do anything to walk it back at all.