3 comments

[ 0.32 ms ] story [ 13.4 ms ] thread
Could someone explain the results of this, rather than the code and the theory?
This is from the "Conclusions" slide: • Deep recurrent nets perform better than their shallow counterparts of the same size on both DSE and ESE extraction. • Both shallow and deep RNNs capture aspects of subjectivity, but deep RNNs seem to better handle the expression boundaries. • Deep RNNs outperforms previous baselines CRF and semi-CRF without having access to the dependency or constituency trees, opinion lexicons or POS tags, even when (semi)CRF has access to word vectors.

tldr: Deep RNN's are better than shallow RNN's and CRF's for several NLP tasks.

OT: Am I the only one practically unable to read the abstract? Grey on white does not work well for my eyes.