This looks terrible. Far more effort and error prone than simply using a regular keyboard on the screen. And is there any evidence to suggest that it's a real problem in the first place? Most people can type pretty fast…
Get it launched, get users, get making money. ASAP.
It'd make even more sense to: a) not have medical bills (Have a decent state provided health system) b) stop suing people for random accidents
Title should have [US] in it. At first I was horrified to imagine it was in the UK (based on bbc site). In the US it's not very surprising at all. But why this is on HN I have no clue.
I think the OP's point is that there's likely hundreds/thousands of sites that aren't directly 'quantified', but get more traffic. Saying 'it's a top 500 site' is only meaningful if all websites in the world are…
Hacker news is pro drugs now. I guess it's just topical what with the weed vote.
Why would you want to go out of your way to keep someone who was responsible for wave?
What about the freedom and safety of being able to breathe clean drug free air? edit: yay hackernews! Just downmod me because your liberal hippy viewpoints disagree. The chances of prop19 passing are 0.
You really want think creating a drug based startup is a good idea? Who would buy it? No one would advertise on it. No users would pay for it. And it would be morally questionable. But if that's what floats your boat...
Drinking doesn't force others to consume the drink. Smoking is something that you're forcing those around you to partake in with you. It's antisocial.
It's topical to people in California, who care about drugs. Not really hackery is it.
It's never been decriminalized in the UK. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_cannabis#United_Kin... Under Labour they reclassified it as class C for a while but then put it back to class B in 2009.
This looks terrible. Far more effort and error prone than simply using a regular keyboard on the screen. And is there any evidence to suggest that it's a real problem in the first place? Most people can type pretty fast…
Get it launched, get users, get making money. ASAP.
It'd make even more sense to: a) not have medical bills (Have a decent state provided health system) b) stop suing people for random accidents
Title should have [US] in it. At first I was horrified to imagine it was in the UK (based on bbc site). In the US it's not very surprising at all. But why this is on HN I have no clue.
I think the OP's point is that there's likely hundreds/thousands of sites that aren't directly 'quantified', but get more traffic. Saying 'it's a top 500 site' is only meaningful if all websites in the world are…
Hacker news is pro drugs now. I guess it's just topical what with the weed vote.
Why would you want to go out of your way to keep someone who was responsible for wave?
What about the freedom and safety of being able to breathe clean drug free air? edit: yay hackernews! Just downmod me because your liberal hippy viewpoints disagree. The chances of prop19 passing are 0.
You really want think creating a drug based startup is a good idea? Who would buy it? No one would advertise on it. No users would pay for it. And it would be morally questionable. But if that's what floats your boat...
Drinking doesn't force others to consume the drink. Smoking is something that you're forcing those around you to partake in with you. It's antisocial.
It's topical to people in California, who care about drugs. Not really hackery is it.
It's never been decriminalized in the UK. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_cannabis#United_Kin... Under Labour they reclassified it as class C for a while but then put it back to class B in 2009.