This is ridiculous!!! Then again we have a legal system, not a justice system. The corrupt will continue bending laws to their advantage. The judge should be ashamed!
Umm, what you said doesn’t have anything to do with what I said. If a person googles “hacker news” this is the first thing that comes up even though there isn’t a whole lot about hacking here. It should really be called…
LMAO!!! I’m so sorry!!! I thought you were offering your services as a mentor and asking apprentices to pay. Please, don’t pay for a mentor. There are so many enthusiastic people in this industry that I am 100% positive…
Wow! I didn’t know Wayfair was in support of Trump! First they deny the kids the rights to see their parents and now they want to take away beds from the kids. Oh, and don’t forget this is happening front and center on…
This article is flawed. It assumes that just because someone stands up for their category means others who aren’t a member will listen and respond reasonably. The examples given in the article contradict the very idea.
So a company does something in the grey area of morality, and it is okay because they didn’t audit the libraries used for their code? They just gave two great reasons not to trust them!
This is ridiculous!!! Then again we have a legal system, not a justice system. The corrupt will continue bending laws to their advantage. The judge should be ashamed!
Umm, what you said doesn’t have anything to do with what I said. If a person googles “hacker news” this is the first thing that comes up even though there isn’t a whole lot about hacking here. It should really be called…
LMAO!!! I’m so sorry!!! I thought you were offering your services as a mentor and asking apprentices to pay. Please, don’t pay for a mentor. There are so many enthusiastic people in this industry that I am 100% positive…
Wow! I didn’t know Wayfair was in support of Trump! First they deny the kids the rights to see their parents and now they want to take away beds from the kids. Oh, and don’t forget this is happening front and center on…
This article is flawed. It assumes that just because someone stands up for their category means others who aren’t a member will listen and respond reasonably. The examples given in the article contradict the very idea.
So a company does something in the grey area of morality, and it is okay because they didn’t audit the libraries used for their code? They just gave two great reasons not to trust them!