11101010001100
No user record in our sample, but 11101010001100 has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
No user record in our sample, but 11101010001100 has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
As a teacher, I try to keep an open mind, but consistently I can find out in 5 minutes of talking to a student if they understand the material. I might just go all in for the oral exams.
The S curve here is not some physical law.
Wait, so no one asked Evan to explain the code? Something smells fishy.
For reference, Harper was PM in 2010.
Interaction in quantum physics is something that remains abstract at a certain level. So long as conservation principles are satisfied (include probability summing to one), interactions are permitted (i.e., what is…
Right, the point is that we don't need a solution to the 'measurement problem' to have a quantum computer.
MRS is this week, you can go and join the conversations with people at the metal level. Probably even talk to the authors themselves!
Any idea if the points raised here https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c00643 were considered in the analysis?
I'm guessing the complex numbers add the right kind of 'fuzziness'. But please share any references if you have.
This all applies at the quantum level. Ask your quantum computing friends why we don't have quantum computers yet.
Sure, energy in equals energy out at equilibrium, but another option is to have a steady state solution where energy is generated leading to potentially large temperature gradients.
Think about the language from a technical perspective. EDIT: On second thought, presumably you did and you are also adding humor!
I don't see how picking a philosophy then claiming the outcome is rational, while picking a different philosophy will lead to a claim that the outcome is irrational is anything more than just quibbling over inconsistent…
What evidence do you have of 'new technology becomes democratized quicker'? People mostly just use technology, but doesn't necessarily correspond to democratization (although the thought leaders would have you think…
Yes, this is the internet.
Keep in mind that these measurements are not straightforward. Large background signal due to these compounds literally being EVERYWHERE!
I extend the same courtesy to this site.
Mike, you seem to have a sore-on for Canada. I am sorry.
I just completed a paper review as a reviewer. After I think 4 rounds, the author finally ran the calculation I had asked for in the initial review and admitted I was right. We got there in the end, but I had to sit on…
funny, i got /textit{much} richer by having kids...