Does this work?
Until they're targeted. You can fool carrier customer service with no training.
https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/nyclu-citys-public-wi-fi... http://rethinklink.nyc/
And all you had to give up was sandboxing and process per site isolation!
This is the first time I've seen someone praising Cardano without me looking for it. Could you elaborate?
Have you heard of GrapheneOS.org?
> Am I not paranoid enough Do you also forgo a fire extinguisher in your kitchen?
Or monitoring for it. That's about right, for those who are playing the game.
Is it flaming if I point out you're probably not American while being one?
A big one set off from a mile up is the normal way science fiction predicts the chaos begins.
Probably reddit, lobsters, newsgroups, mailing lists, Matrix, IRC, etc. Like any good CTO type.
This feels wrong.
Giving options to your executives is....historically really risky.
Even the official whois web application for this?
Your guess is as good as mine. Misdirected hatred at Google services privacy bleeding into this debate? Anyway, please read GrapheneOS.org in its entirety.
Without Google Play Services, this is blatantly untrue. Evidence otherwise appreciated, even if just a compelling theory...
Google privacy is 0%, security is high 90s%
Just a few days ago, I saw their promotions on their page offering a bit of new coins to learn more about their specific utility and technology behind them. I dunno.
This is my 39th account on Hacker News. Anonymity is a tenant of the internet. Please never forget it, next generation. It's so important.
If a phone runs the Linux kernel, and are hit with one of dozens and dozens of known unpatched exploits, and has no boot security to detect such, expect your hardware switches to be useless when faced with any motivated…
Ah, right - the "who needs security and privacy - we're building things so fast!" crowd.
Especially ones that are wildly monied/connected, and ones that Western apparatuses are used to allowing to skirt justice regularly.
That guy actually believed what he was saying.
Riskier only because of the lack of experience of the people involved, and the UX gaps still being filled in - cryptocurrency is a very early-stage success(?) story of what will be a 1,000+ year journey.
See my other comment which can be summarized for this response as: technical/fundamental superiority has never been, and is currently not, a silver bullet to proliferation of a technology, or the success of a company.…
Does this work?
Until they're targeted. You can fool carrier customer service with no training.
https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/nyclu-citys-public-wi-fi... http://rethinklink.nyc/
And all you had to give up was sandboxing and process per site isolation!
This is the first time I've seen someone praising Cardano without me looking for it. Could you elaborate?
Have you heard of GrapheneOS.org?
> Am I not paranoid enough Do you also forgo a fire extinguisher in your kitchen?
Or monitoring for it. That's about right, for those who are playing the game.
Is it flaming if I point out you're probably not American while being one?
A big one set off from a mile up is the normal way science fiction predicts the chaos begins.
Probably reddit, lobsters, newsgroups, mailing lists, Matrix, IRC, etc. Like any good CTO type.
This feels wrong.
Giving options to your executives is....historically really risky.
Even the official whois web application for this?
Your guess is as good as mine. Misdirected hatred at Google services privacy bleeding into this debate? Anyway, please read GrapheneOS.org in its entirety.
Without Google Play Services, this is blatantly untrue. Evidence otherwise appreciated, even if just a compelling theory...
Google privacy is 0%, security is high 90s%
Just a few days ago, I saw their promotions on their page offering a bit of new coins to learn more about their specific utility and technology behind them. I dunno.
This is my 39th account on Hacker News. Anonymity is a tenant of the internet. Please never forget it, next generation. It's so important.
If a phone runs the Linux kernel, and are hit with one of dozens and dozens of known unpatched exploits, and has no boot security to detect such, expect your hardware switches to be useless when faced with any motivated…
Ah, right - the "who needs security and privacy - we're building things so fast!" crowd.
Especially ones that are wildly monied/connected, and ones that Western apparatuses are used to allowing to skirt justice regularly.
That guy actually believed what he was saying.
Riskier only because of the lack of experience of the people involved, and the UX gaps still being filled in - cryptocurrency is a very early-stage success(?) story of what will be a 1,000+ year journey.
See my other comment which can be summarized for this response as: technical/fundamental superiority has never been, and is currently not, a silver bullet to proliferation of a technology, or the success of a company.…