2479411230
No user record in our sample, but 2479411230 has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
No user record in our sample, but 2479411230 has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
> that an earthquake would happen in 25 years and 50 years later not so much as the tiniest tremor ever occurring. First, we are already seeing early effects of climate change…
Sorry, I'm still a bit confused. I guess I phrased my question poorly. > there were SOME scientists concerned about global cooling in the 1960's and 1970's I get that the existence of the letter implies that people were…
Yes, it will lead to increased flora. > Increased temperatures can lengthen growing seasons, higher carbon dioxide concentrations can enhance plant growth, and in some areas rainfall and the availability of water…
> predicted we’d all be dead by now I don't think that's what people were predicting. If I'm understanding your argument correctly, it's that people have been worrying/predicting issues with the climate for a while, but…
> People assume you're stupid if ask questions like this, and you get the equivalent of someone speaking louder and slower when they realize someone doesn't speak english. I'd genuinely tried to answer the question. If…
> Can we explore this issue from a not-panicked perspective? I think we tried doing that. See, for example, Carl Sagan testifying before Congress in 1985 [1]. I _wish_ that fossil fuels could be on your list. I think a…